linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/audit: consolidate handling of mm->exe_file
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:00:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424530825.6539.7.camel@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhQxi3YNPFvmfMS6aceC=mi_LcaLD6gqb2zKEb8K_qnZLQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 08:45 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 22:23 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> I'd prefer if the audit_log_d_path_exe() helper wasn't a static inline.
> >
> > What do you have in mind?
> 
> Pretty much what I said before, audit_log_d_path_exe() as a
> traditional function and not an inline.  Put the function in
> kernel/audit.c.

well yes I know that, which is why I showed you the code sizes. Now
again, do you have any reason? This function will only get less bulky in
the future.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-21 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-19  0:10 [PATCH -part1 0/3] mm: improve " Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-19  0:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel/audit: consolidate " Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-19  3:23   ` Paul Moore
2015-02-21  1:23     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-21 13:45       ` Paul Moore
2015-02-21 15:00         ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2015-02-22 13:14           ` Paul Moore
2015-02-23  2:20   ` [PATCH v2 " Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-23 21:59     ` Paul Moore
2015-02-23 22:02       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-23 22:24         ` Paul Moore
2015-02-19  0:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernel/audit: robustify " Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-23  2:20   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] kernel/audit: reduce mmap_sem hold for mm->exe_file Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-23 21:59     ` Paul Moore
2015-02-19  0:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] tomoyo: robustify handling of mm->exe_file Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-19  5:38   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-19 11:07     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-02-19 18:22       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-19 22:11         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-02-20 16:28           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-24  2:45             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-24 11:35             ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-02-24 19:42               ` [PATCH v3 3/3] tomoyo: reduce mmap_sem hold for mm->exe_file Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-25 11:40                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-02-25 17:39                   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-03-04 17:35                   ` Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1424530825.6539.7.camel@stgolabs.net \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox