From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14190.31634.420888.788269@dukat.scot.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 18:51:14 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [RFC] [RFT] [PATCH] kanoj-mm9-2.2.10 simplify swapcache/shm code interaction In-Reply-To: <199906211717.KAA67065@google.engr.sgi.com> References: <14190.16136.552955.557245@dukat.scot.redhat.com> <199906211717.KAA67065@google.engr.sgi.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Kanoj Sarcar Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, andrea@suse.de List-ID: Hi, On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:17:10 -0700 (PDT), kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar) said: > Okay, wrong choice of name on the parameter "shmfs". Would it help > to think of the new last parameter to rw_swap_page_base as "dolock", > which the caller has to pass in to indicate whether there is a > swap lock map bit? Maybe, but I still don't see what it buys. --Stephen -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/