From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 7/8] mm/hugetlb: fix suboptimal migration/hwpoisoned entry check
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:26:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417508759-10848-8-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417508759-10848-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Currently hugetlb_fault() checks at first whether pte of the faulted address
is a migration or hwpoisoned entry, which means that we call huge_ptep_get()
twice in single hugetlb_fault(). This is not optimized. The reason of this
approach is that without checking at first, huge_pte_alloc() can trigger
BUG_ON() because pmd_huge() returned false for non-present hugetlb entry.
With a previous patch in this series, pmd_huge() becomes to return true
for non-present entry, so we no longer need this dirty workaround.
Let's move the checking code to the proper place.
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 26 +++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git mmotm-2014-11-26-15-45.orig/mm/hugetlb.c mmotm-2014-11-26-15-45/mm/hugetlb.c
index a2bfd02e289f..6c38f9ad3d56 100644
--- mmotm-2014-11-26-15-45.orig/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ mmotm-2014-11-26-15-45/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3136,20 +3136,10 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
struct address_space *mapping;
int need_wait_lock = 0;
+ int need_wait_migration = 0;
address &= huge_page_mask(h);
- ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address);
- if (ptep) {
- entry = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
- if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(entry))) {
- migration_entry_wait_huge(vma, mm, ptep);
- return 0;
- } else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(entry)))
- return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE |
- VM_FAULT_SET_HINDEX(hstate_index(h));
- }
-
ptep = huge_pte_alloc(mm, address, huge_page_size(h));
if (!ptep)
return VM_FAULT_OOM;
@@ -3176,12 +3166,16 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
/*
* entry could be a migration/hwpoison entry at this point, so this
* check prevents the kernel from going below assuming that we have
- * a active hugepage in pagecache. This goto expects the 2nd page fault,
- * and is_hugetlb_entry_(migration|hwpoisoned) check will properly
- * handle it.
+ * a active hugepage in pagecache.
*/
- if (!pte_present(entry))
+ if (!pte_present(entry)) {
+ if (is_hugetlb_entry_migration(entry))
+ need_wait_migration = 1;
+ else if (is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(entry))
+ ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE |
+ VM_FAULT_SET_HINDEX(hstate_index(h));
goto out_mutex;
+ }
/*
* If we are going to COW the mapping later, we examine the pending
@@ -3247,6 +3241,8 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
}
out_mutex:
mutex_unlock(&htlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
+ if (need_wait_migration)
+ migration_entry_wait_huge(vma, mm, ptep);
/*
* Generally it's safe to hold refcount during waiting page lock. But
* here we just wait to defer the next page fault to avoid busy loop and
--
2.2.0.rc0.2.gf745acb
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-02 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-02 8:26 [PATCH 0/8] hugepage migration fixes (v5) Naoya Horiguchi
2014-12-02 8:26 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] mm/hugetlb: fix getting refcount 0 page in hugetlb_fault() Naoya Horiguchi
2014-12-02 8:26 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] mm/hugetlb: take page table lock in follow_huge_pmd() Naoya Horiguchi
2014-12-02 8:26 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around follow_huge_* Naoya Horiguchi
2014-12-02 8:26 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] mm/hugetlb: pmd_huge() returns true for non-present hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2014-12-02 8:26 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] mm/hugetlb: add migration entry check in __unmap_hugepage_range Naoya Horiguchi
2014-12-02 8:26 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] mm/hugetlb: add migration/hwpoisoned entry check in hugetlb_change_protection Naoya Horiguchi
2014-12-02 8:26 ` Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2014-12-02 8:26 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] mm/hugetlb: cleanup and rename is_hugetlb_entry_(migration|hwpoisoned)() Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1417508759-10848-8-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--to=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox