linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@monkey.org>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES]
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 00:39:14 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14157.55202.444836.684237@dukat.scot.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9905271552420.16505-100000@funky.monkey.org>

Hi,

On Thu, 27 May 1999 15:55:37 -0400 (EDT), Chuck Lever <cel@monkey.org> said:

> this patch appears to combine the "block allocation deadlock" patch with
> the original fsync reimplementation... correct?

Yep, and that was unintentional.  Fixed.

> have you experienced and/or fixed the 5-second self-destruct problem i
> mentioned to you?

No, and yes --- I needed to add an invalidate_inode_buffers() during
inode invalidation.  Unmounting with writes pending appears to work fine
now.

Fixed patch for 2.2.9 is at

ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/sct/fs/misc/fsync-2.2.9-a.diff

--Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm my@address'
in the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~1999-05-27 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-05-23  3:36 [PATCHES] Eric W. Biederman
1999-05-23  6:03 ` [PATCHES] Linus Torvalds
1999-05-23 14:54   ` [PATCHES] Eric W. Biederman
1999-05-23 15:49     ` [PATCHES] Ingo Molnar
1999-05-23 18:34       ` [PATCHES] Eric W. Biederman
1999-05-27  6:24         ` [PATCHES] Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-05-27 19:55           ` [PATCHES] Chuck Lever
1999-05-27 23:39             ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
1999-05-28  5:30               ` [PATCHES] Chuck Lever
1999-05-29  1:24                 ` [PATCHES] Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-05-30 17:01           ` [PATCHES] Eric W. Biederman
1999-05-27  6:25         ` [PATCHES] Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-05-24 17:20       ` [PATCHES] Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14157.55202.444836.684237@dukat.scot.redhat.com \
    --to=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=cel@monkey.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox