From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 2/3] mm: memcontrol: simplify detecting when the memory+swap limit is hit
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:08:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1411571338-8178-3-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411571338-8178-1-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
When attempting to charge pages, we first charge the memory counter
and then the memory+swap counter. If one of the counters is at its
limit, we enter reclaim, but if it's the memory+swap counter, reclaim
shouldn't swap because that wouldn't change the situation. However,
if the counters have the same limits, we never get to the memory+swap
limit. To know whether reclaim should swap or not, there is a state
flag that indicates whether the limits are equal and whether hitting
the memory limit implies hitting the memory+swap limit.
Just try the memory+swap counter first.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 47 +++++++++++++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 1ec22bf380d0..89c920156c2a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -315,9 +315,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
/* OOM-Killer disable */
int oom_kill_disable;
- /* set when res.limit == memsw.limit */
- bool memsw_is_minimum;
-
/* protect arrays of thresholds */
struct mutex thresholds_lock;
@@ -1804,8 +1801,6 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
if (flags & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP)
noswap = true;
- if (!(flags & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK) && memcg->memsw_is_minimum)
- noswap = true;
for (loop = 0; loop < MEM_CGROUP_MAX_RECLAIM_LOOPS; loop++) {
if (loop)
@@ -2543,16 +2538,17 @@ retry:
goto done;
size = batch * PAGE_SIZE;
- if (!res_counter_charge(&memcg->res, size, &fail_res)) {
- if (!do_swap_account)
+ if (!do_swap_account ||
+ !res_counter_charge(&memcg->memsw, size, &fail_res)) {
+ if (!res_counter_charge(&memcg->res, size, &fail_res))
goto done_restock;
- if (!res_counter_charge(&memcg->memsw, size, &fail_res))
- goto done_restock;
- res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->res, size);
+ if (do_swap_account)
+ res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, size);
+ mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, res);
+ } else {
mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, memsw);
flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
- } else
- mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, res);
+ }
if (batch > nr_pages) {
batch = nr_pages;
@@ -3615,7 +3611,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
unsigned long long val)
{
int retry_count;
- u64 memswlimit, memlimit;
int ret = 0;
int children = mem_cgroup_count_children(memcg);
u64 curusage, oldusage;
@@ -3642,24 +3637,16 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
* We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit.
*/
mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
- memswlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT);
- if (memswlimit < val) {
+ if (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT) < val) {
ret = -EINVAL;
mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
break;
}
- memlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT);
- if (memlimit < val)
+ if (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT) < val)
enlarge = 1;
ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->res, val);
- if (!ret) {
- if (memswlimit == val)
- memcg->memsw_is_minimum = true;
- else
- memcg->memsw_is_minimum = false;
- }
mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
if (!ret)
@@ -3684,7 +3671,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
unsigned long long val)
{
int retry_count;
- u64 memlimit, memswlimit, oldusage, curusage;
+ u64 oldusage, curusage;
int children = mem_cgroup_count_children(memcg);
int ret = -EBUSY;
int enlarge = 0;
@@ -3703,22 +3690,14 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
* We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit.
*/
mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
- memlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT);
- if (memlimit > val) {
+ if (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT) > val) {
ret = -EINVAL;
mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
break;
}
- memswlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT);
- if (memswlimit < val)
+ if (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT) < val)
enlarge = 1;
ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->memsw, val);
- if (!ret) {
- if (memlimit == val)
- memcg->memsw_is_minimum = true;
- else
- memcg->memsw_is_minimum = false;
- }
mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
if (!ret)
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-24 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 15:08 [patch 0/3] mm: memcontrol: performance fixlets for 3.18 Johannes Weiner
2014-09-24 15:08 ` [patch 1/3] mm: memcontrol: do not kill uncharge batching in free_pages_and_swap_cache Johannes Weiner
2014-09-24 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-24 21:03 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-09-24 21:15 ` Andrew Morton
2014-09-25 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2014-10-02 15:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH] mm-memcontrol-do-not-kill-uncharge-batching-in-free_pages_and_swap_cache-fix.patch Michal Hocko
2014-09-24 15:08 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2014-09-24 15:14 ` [patch 2/3] mm: memcontrol: simplify detecting when the memory+swap limit is hit Vladimir Davydov
2014-09-25 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
2014-09-24 15:08 ` [patch 3/3] mm: memcontrol: fix transparent huge page allocations under pressure Johannes Weiner
2014-09-29 13:57 ` Michal Hocko
2014-09-29 17:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-10-07 13:59 ` Michal Hocko
2014-10-08 1:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-10-08 15:33 ` Michal Hocko
2014-10-08 17:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-10-11 23:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-10-17 9:37 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1411571338-8178-3-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox