From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 4/4] mm: vmscan: move swappiness out of scan_control
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:33:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403282030-29915-4-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403282030-29915-1-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Swappiness is determined for each scanned memcg individually in
shrink_zone() and is not a parameter that applies throughout the
reclaim scan. Move it out of struct scan_control to prevent
accidental use of a stale value.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index d0bc1a209746..757e2a8dbf58 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -89,9 +89,6 @@ struct scan_control {
/* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
int priority;
- /* anon vs. file LRUs scanning "ratio" */
- int swappiness;
-
/*
* The memory cgroup that hit its limit and as a result is the
* primary target of this reclaim invocation.
@@ -1868,8 +1865,8 @@ enum scan_balance {
* nr[0] = anon inactive pages to scan; nr[1] = anon active pages to scan
* nr[2] = file inactive pages to scan; nr[3] = file active pages to scan
*/
-static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
- unsigned long *nr)
+static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness,
+ struct scan_control *sc, unsigned long *nr)
{
struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
u64 fraction[2];
@@ -1912,7 +1909,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
* using the memory controller's swap limit feature would be
* too expensive.
*/
- if (!global_reclaim(sc) && !sc->swappiness) {
+ if (!global_reclaim(sc) && !swappiness) {
scan_balance = SCAN_FILE;
goto out;
}
@@ -1922,7 +1919,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
* system is close to OOM, scan both anon and file equally
* (unless the swappiness setting disagrees with swapping).
*/
- if (!sc->priority && sc->swappiness) {
+ if (!sc->priority && swappiness) {
scan_balance = SCAN_EQUAL;
goto out;
}
@@ -1965,7 +1962,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
* With swappiness at 100, anonymous and file have the same priority.
* This scanning priority is essentially the inverse of IO cost.
*/
- anon_prio = sc->swappiness;
+ anon_prio = swappiness;
file_prio = 200 - anon_prio;
/*
@@ -2055,7 +2052,8 @@ out:
/*
* This is a basic per-zone page freer. Used by both kswapd and direct reclaim.
*/
-static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
+static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness,
+ struct scan_control *sc)
{
unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
@@ -2066,7 +2064,7 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
struct blk_plug plug;
bool scan_adjusted;
- get_scan_count(lruvec, sc, nr);
+ get_scan_count(lruvec, swappiness, sc, nr);
/* Record the original scan target for proportional adjustments later */
memcpy(targets, nr, sizeof(nr));
@@ -2263,11 +2261,12 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim);
do {
struct lruvec *lruvec;
+ int swappiness;
lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg);
+ swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg);
- sc->swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg);
- shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+ shrink_lruvec(lruvec, swappiness, sc);
/*
* Direct reclaim and kswapd have to scan all memory
@@ -2714,10 +2713,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
.may_swap = !noswap,
.order = 0,
.priority = 0,
- .swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg),
.target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
};
struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg);
+ int swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg);
sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
@@ -2733,7 +2732,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
* will pick up pages from other mem cgroup's as well. We hack
* the priority and make it zero.
*/
- shrink_lruvec(lruvec, &sc);
+ shrink_lruvec(lruvec, swappiness, &sc);
trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed);
--
2.0.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-20 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-20 16:33 [patch 1/4] mm: vmscan: remove remains of kswapd-managed zone->all_unreclaimable Johannes Weiner
2014-06-20 16:33 ` [patch 2/4] mm: vmscan: rework compaction-ready signaling in direct reclaim Johannes Weiner
2014-06-20 16:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-20 20:24 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-23 7:28 ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-23 6:36 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-23 18:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-23 13:07 ` Mel Gorman
2014-06-23 17:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-25 9:55 ` Mel Gorman
2014-06-20 16:33 ` [patch 3/4] mm: vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable() Johannes Weiner
2014-06-23 6:48 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-23 8:35 ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-23 13:32 ` Mel Gorman
2014-06-20 16:33 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2014-06-23 6:51 ` [patch 4/4] mm: vmscan: move swappiness out of scan_control Minchan Kim
2014-06-23 9:12 ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-23 6:16 ` [patch 1/4] mm: vmscan: remove remains of kswapd-managed zone->all_unreclaimable Minchan Kim
2014-06-23 16:01 ` Motohiro Kosaki
2014-06-23 7:49 ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-23 12:56 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403282030-29915-4-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox