linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm, memcg: allow OOM if no memcg is eligible during direct reclaim
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:00:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402473624-13827-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140611075729.GA4520@dhcp22.suse.cz>

If there is no memcg eligible for reclaim because all groups under the
reclaimed hierarchy are within their guarantee then the global direct
reclaim would end up in the endless loop because zones in the zonelists
are not considered unreclaimable (as per all_unreclaimable) and so the
OOM killer would never fire and direct reclaim would be triggered
without no chance to reclaim anything.

This is not possible yet because reclaim falls back to ignore low_limit
when nobody is eligible for reclaim. Following patch will allow to set
the fallback mode to hard guarantee, though, so this is a preparatory
patch.

Memcg reclaim doesn't suffer from this because the OOM killer is
triggered after few unsuccessful attempts of the reclaim.

Fix this by checking the number of scanned pages which is obviously 0 if
nobody is eligible and also check that the whole tree hierarchy is not
eligible and tell OOM it can go ahead.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8041b0667673..99137aecd95f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2570,6 +2570,13 @@ out:
 	if (aborted_reclaim)
 		return 1;
 
+	/*
+	 * If the target memcg is not eligible for reclaim then we have no option
+	 * but OOM
+	 */
+	if (!sc->nr_scanned && mem_cgroup_all_within_guarantee(sc->target_mem_cgroup))
+		return 0;
+
 	/* top priority shrink_zones still had more to do? don't OOM, then */
 	if (global_reclaim(sc) && !all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc))
 		return 1;
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-11  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-28 12:26 [PATCH v2 0/4] memcg: Low-limit reclaim Michal Hocko
2014-04-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg, mm: introduce lowlimit reclaim Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 22:55   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-02  9:36     ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-02 12:07       ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-02 13:01         ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-02 14:15           ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-02 15:04             ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-02 15:11               ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-02 15:34                 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-02 15:48                   ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-06 19:58                     ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-02 15:58       ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-02 16:49         ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-02 22:00           ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-05 14:21             ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-19 16:18               ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-11 15:15               ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-11 16:08                 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-06 13:29             ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-06 14:32               ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-06 15:21                 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-06 16:12                   ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-06 16:51                     ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-06 18:30                       ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-06 19:55                         ` Johannes Weiner
2014-04-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: Allow setting low_limit Michal Hocko
2014-04-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] memcg, doc: clarify global vs. limit reclaims Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 23:03   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-02  9:43     ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-06 19:56       ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] memcg: Document memory.low_limit_in_bytes Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 22:57   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-02  9:46     ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] memcg: Low-limit reclaim Roman Gushchin
2014-04-29  7:42   ` Greg Thelen
2014-04-29 10:50     ` Roman Gushchin
2014-04-29 12:54       ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-30 22:49   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-02 12:03   ` Michal Hocko
2014-04-30 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-02 11:22   ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-28 12:10 ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-28 13:49   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-28 14:21     ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-28 15:28       ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-28 15:54         ` Michal Hocko
2014-05-28 16:33           ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-03 11:07             ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-03 14:22               ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-04 14:46                 ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-04 15:44                   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-04 19:18                     ` Hugh Dickins
2014-06-04 21:45                       ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-05 14:51                         ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-05 16:10                           ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-05 16:43                             ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-05 18:23                               ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-06 14:44                                 ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-06 14:46                                   ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, memcg: allow OOM if no memcg is eligible during direct reclaim Michal Hocko
2014-06-06 14:46                                     ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: Allow hard guarantee mode for low limit reclaim Michal Hocko
2014-06-06 15:29                                       ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-06 15:34                                         ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-09  8:30                                         ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-09 13:54                                           ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-09 22:52                                       ` Greg Thelen
2014-06-10 16:57                                         ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-10 22:16                                           ` Greg Thelen
2014-06-11  7:57                                           ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-11  8:00                                             ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-06-11  8:00                                               ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: Allow guarantee reclaim Michal Hocko
2014-06-11 15:36                                                 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-12 13:22                                                   ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-12 13:56                                                     ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-12 14:22                                                       ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-12 16:17                                                         ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-16 12:59                                                           ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-16 13:57                                                             ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-16 14:04                                                               ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-16 14:12                                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-16 14:29                                                                   ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-16 14:40                                                                     ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-12 16:51                                                         ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-16 13:22                                                           ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-11 15:20                                               ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, memcg: allow OOM if no memcg is eligible during direct reclaim Johannes Weiner
2014-06-11 16:14                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-11 12:31                                             ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: Allow hard guarantee mode for low limit reclaim Tejun Heo
2014-06-11 14:11                                               ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-11 15:34                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-05 19:36                       ` [PATCH v2 0/4] memcg: Low-limit reclaim Tejun Heo
2014-06-05 14:32                     ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-05 15:43                       ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-05 16:09                         ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-05 16:46                           ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-28 16:17         ` Greg Thelen
2014-06-03 11:09           ` Michal Hocko
2014-06-03 14:01             ` Greg Thelen
2014-06-03 14:44               ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1402473624-13827-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=klamm@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox