From: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de, mhocko@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: avoid scanning the whole targets[*] when scan_balance equals SCAN_FILE/SCAN_ANON
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 21:47:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402062463.15497.7.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140606131251.GB2878@cmpxchg.org>
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:12 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 04:54:26PM +0800, Chen Yucong wrote:
> > If (scan_balance == SCAN_FILE) is true for shrink_lruvec, then the value of
> > targets[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] and targets[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] will be zero. As a result,
> > the value of 'percentage' will also be zero, and the *whole* targets[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]
> > and targets[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] will be scanned.
> >
> > For (scan_balance == SCAN_ANON), there is the same conditions stated above.
> >
> > But via https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/10/334, we can find that the kernel does not prefer
> > reclaiming too many pages from the other LRU. So before recalculating the other LRU scan
> > count based on its original scan targets and the percentage scanning already complete, we
> > should need to check whether 'scan_balance' equals SCAN_FILE/SCAN_ANON.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > mm/vmscan.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index d51f7e0..ca3f5f1 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -2120,6 +2120,9 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
> > percentage = nr_file * 100 / scan_target;
> > }
> >
> > + if (targets[lru] == 0 && targets[lru + LRU_ACTIVE] == 0)
> > + break;
>
> We have meanwhile included a change that bails out if nr_anon or
> nr_file are zero, right before that percentage calculation, that
> should cover the scenario you're describing. It's called:
>
> mm: vmscan: use proportional scanning during direct reclaim and full scan at DEF_PRIORITY
Thanks very much for your reply. Indeed, your patch is more
comprehensive and perfect. I think I need to update my local
git-repository timely.
thx!
cyc
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 8:54 Chen Yucong
2014-06-06 13:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-06-06 13:47 ` Chen Yucong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402062463.15497.7.camel@debian \
--to=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox