From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Shrinkers and proportional reclaim
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 10:22:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400779362.2970.322.camel@schen9-DESK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400749779-24879-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 10:09 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This series is aimed at regressions noticed during reclaim activity. The
> first two patches are shrinker patches that were posted ages ago but never
> merged for reasons that are unclear to me. I'm posting them again to see if
> there was a reason they were dropped or if they just got lost. Dave? Time?
As far as I remembered, I think Dave was planning to merge this as part
of his VFS scalability patch series. Otherwise there wasn't any other
issues.
Thanks to Mel for looking at these patches and Yunhan for testing them.
Tim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-22 9:09 Mel Gorman
2014-05-22 9:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs/superblock: Unregister sb shrinker before ->kill_sb() Mel Gorman
2014-05-22 15:52 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-22 9:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs/superblock: Avoid locking counting inodes and dentries before reclaiming them Mel Gorman
2014-05-22 15:59 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-22 9:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: vmscan: Use proportional scanning during direct reclaim and full scan at DEF_PRIORITY Mel Gorman
2014-05-22 16:04 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-22 16:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] Shrinkers and proportional reclaim Yuanhan Liu
2014-05-22 16:30 ` Mel Gorman
2014-05-23 2:43 ` Yuanhan Liu
2014-05-22 17:22 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2014-05-26 21:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-05-27 2:37 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-27 21:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-05-27 23:02 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-05-27 23:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-05-28 1:37 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1400779362.2970.322.camel@schen9-DESK \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox