From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure: fix deadlock when hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap is enabled
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:52:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13aa38af-46a1-3894-32bd-c3eb6ef67359@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhVoatdJZ1RWu2r3@localhost.localdomain>
On 2024/4/10 0:10, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:10:22PM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 04:54:56PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> In short, below scene breaks the lock dependency chain:
>>>
>>> memory_failure
>>> __page_handle_poison
>>> zone_pcp_disable -- lock(pcp_batch_high_lock)
>>> dissolve_free_huge_page
>>> __hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio
>>> static_key_slow_dec
>>> cpus_read_lock -- rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock)
>>>
>>> Fix this by calling drain_all_pages() instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Thanks.
>
> On a second though,
>
> disabling pcp via zone_pcp_disable() was a deterministic approach.
> Now, with drain_all_pages() we drain PCP queues to buddy, but nothing
> guarantees that those pages do not end up in a PCP queue again before we
> the call to take_page_off_budy() if we
> need refilling, right?
AFAICS, iff check_pages_enabled static key is enabled and in hard offline mode,
check_new_pages() will prevent those pages from ending up in a PCP queue again
when refilling PCP list. Because PageHWPoison pages will be taken as 'bad' pages
and skipped when refill PCP list.
>
> I guess we can live with that because we will let the system know that we
> failed to isolate that page.
We're trying best to isolate that page anyway. :)
Thanks for your thought.
.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-07 8:54 Miaohe Lin
2024-04-08 19:29 ` Andrew Morton
2024-04-09 1:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-04-09 14:10 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-04-09 16:10 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-04-10 7:52 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2024-04-10 8:52 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-04-11 2:26 ` Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13aa38af-46a1-3894-32bd-c3eb6ef67359@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox