From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6B6C46CD2 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 12:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id EBE158D0019; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 07:02:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E6D978D0018; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 07:02:27 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D83F28D0019; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 07:02:27 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99798D0018 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 07:02:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin18.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9568F120604 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 12:02:27 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81648748734.18.27D497C Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B8E40017 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 12:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of regressions@leemhuis.info designates 80.237.130.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=regressions@leemhuis.info ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1704542545; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qrU6pjOZunIA1yqSzQBx6W/kuR+ax0qRW7oDumTPAEE=; b=A5gz+rggD+O555M69RUSBUpe5LJ94uCC2pQgdJdVnCRj4q0UA/Kj1pbzRX3brqEecvStXU UhT4u4pH1P0xUo4xb7wODejwSh9BubA+m7mxtu65ccIDsWiPOtBawkbUT56gZPrnXcEP20 vnyWbE5u+wAzVbxTiBx4IYZxfen2Is8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of regressions@leemhuis.info designates 80.237.130.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=regressions@leemhuis.info ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1704542545; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=34grkniKMgG0qw7zDDCknHq/h0ZE6yGAzhRIBkj0VndQ7Tcb5RkLM1U7YJXj+aqYgA1Mx/ W/W+cE6VO+fTjLNlbiGxjO8qeC4Q0iCcMZvz0t6BGlc23pzOr+/EP1FznaT19CzqIWpXLr 6/BrBKbUCVQ9N1wYSoxPrJDsXiHM7yA= Received: from [2a02:8108:8980:2478:8cde:aa2c:f324:937e]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1rM5Na-0002BV-Si; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 13:02:18 +0100 Message-ID: <13a70cc5-78fc-49a4-8d78-41e5479e3023@leemhuis.info> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 13:02:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [Regression 6.1.y] From "cifs: Fix flushing, invalidation and file size with copy_file_range()" Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: Salvatore Bonaccorso , Linux regressions mailing list , "Jitindar Singh, Suraj" Cc: "rohiths.msft@gmail.com" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "stfrench@microsoft.com" , "dhowells@redhat.com" , "pc@manguebit.com" , "jlayton@kernel.org" , "nspmangalore@gmail.com" , "willy@infradead.org" , "stable-commits@vger.kernel.org" , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org References: <2023121124-trifle-uncharted-2622@gregkh> <8e59220d-b0f3-4dae-afc3-36acfa6873e4@leemhuis.info> From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" Reply-To: Linux regressions mailing list In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1704542545;f69b91b9; X-HE-SMSGID: 1rM5Na-0002BV-Si X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 86B8E40017 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Stat-Signature: ka53bxtmja89dnkpfxpauikbigsuf7nj X-HE-Tag: 1704542545-646021 X-HE-Meta: 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 lnsnbQI4 niwhZToBsI2+epSodbaI4aVjBT7bo5orTqjmeGg3M/q00WqVdz3R8m2awKght0q/21fbdqKWZcOBXLZYWpaMmVT/UPXmQVrw4Kt6mQhqBAZOvstRZJ09Q/R/RZomaLHDqU3I/2QCR7zp9nkcPwpK0q+etfQCNDFnZA2lAXivIuwepZCLiS6E4y2m5NxEliwtjbs2Ur+wf66XZE+r8BOtBi4GFLmV/2s+IyxpTmBWVoqlLQH9ImUTznWxQqo3QnUI4AqdnqfG1NSfVhGvFLpiOEhaMV1qCLE/wKkMZNPyO46pRnsGIR/Dq5IkkXQb3zRd48cdiyQxiwra8exIbcqDxcgNxn+/maCgNDP8dKlkbEnzXQt3tk2v4d8pYcBOg8cBKFd0h2ZytdqJ4TOCw2q/cU6gLoW4qebRuU0Z9CIF6qRxsWzxMRKesKGqD9gKBvFQZvwHKozEG+WnHNw3exMaXX88X1fzUbjdoq5INOrQk2tpQBW0= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000387, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 06.01.24 12:34, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 11:40:58AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >> >> Does this problem also happen in mainline, e.g. with 6.7-rc8? > > Thanks a lot for replying back. So far I can tell, the regression is > in 6.1.y only Ahh, good to know, thx! > For this reason I added to regzbot only "regzbot ^introduced > 18b02e4343e8f5be6a2f44c7ad9899b385a92730" which is the commit in > v6.1.68. Which was the totally right thing to do, thx. Guess I sooner or later will add something like "#regzbot tag notinmainline" to avoid the ambiguity we just cleared up, but maybe that's overkill. Ciao, Thorsten!