linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Linux Kernel, Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] kmemleak on __radix_tree_preload
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 09:06:29 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399593989.13268.59.camel@kjgkr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140508165217.GI17344@arm.com>

2014-05-08 (ea(C)), 17:52 +0100, Catalin Marinas:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:29:48PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > BTW, is it safe to have a union overlapping node->parent and
> > > node->rcu_head.next? I'm still staring at the radix-tree code but a
> > > scenario I have in mind is that call_rcu() has been raised for a few
> > > nodes, other CPU may have some reference to one of them and set
> > > node->parent to NULL (e.g. concurrent calls to radix_tree_shrink()),
> > > breaking the RCU linking. I can't confirm this theory yet ;)
> > 
> > If this were reproducible, I would suggest retrying with non-overlapping
> > node->parent and node->rcu_head.next, but you knew that already.  ;-)
> 
> Reading the code, I'm less convinced about this scenario (though it's
> worth checking without the union).
> 
> > But the usual practice would be to make node removal exclude shrinking.
> > And the radix-tree code seems to delegate locking to the caller.
> > 
> > So, is the correct locking present in the page cache?  The radix-tree
> > code seems to assume that all update operations for a given tree are
> > protected by a lock global to that tree.
> 
> The calling code in mm/filemap.c holds mapping->tree_lock when deleting
> radix-tree nodes, so no concurrent calls.
> 
> > Another diagnosis approach would be to build with
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y, which would complain about double
> > call_rcu() invocations.  Rumor has it that is is necessary to turn off
> > other kmem debugging for this to tell you anything -- I have seen cases
> > where the kmem debugging obscures the debug-objects diagnostics.
> 
> Another test Jaegeuk could run (hopefully he has some time to look into
> this).

Yap, I'll test this too.
Thanks,

> 
> Thanks for suggestions.
> 

-- 
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-09  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-25  1:45 Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-01 17:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-01 18:41   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-07  2:58     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-07 11:39       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08  9:16         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-08  9:26           ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08  9:37             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-08 10:24               ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 15:00                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-08 15:29                   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 15:53                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-08 16:52                       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-09  0:06                         ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2014-05-08 17:52                       ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-08 21:40                         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-09  0:01                     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-09  9:45                       ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1399593989.13268.59.camel@kjgkr \
    --to=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox