* [RESEND PATCH] slub: fix high order page allocation problem with __GFP_NOFAIL
@ 2014-03-12 8:26 Joonsoo Kim
2014-03-13 0:49 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joonsoo Kim @ 2014-03-12 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
Joonsoo Kim, Andrew Morton, Christian Casteyde, Joonsoo Kim
SLUB already try to allocate high order page with clearing __GFP_NOFAIL.
But, when allocating shadow page for kmemcheck, it missed clearing
the flag. This trigger WARN_ON_ONCE() reported by Christian Casteyde.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65991
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/3/764
This patch fix this situation by using same allocation flag as original
allocation.
Reported-by: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 3508ede..d43b063 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1348,11 +1348,12 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
page = alloc_slab_page(alloc_gfp, node, oo);
if (unlikely(!page)) {
oo = s->min;
+ alloc_gfp = flags;
/*
* Allocation may have failed due to fragmentation.
* Try a lower order alloc if possible
*/
- page = alloc_slab_page(flags, node, oo);
+ page = alloc_slab_page(alloc_gfp, node, oo);
if (page)
stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
@@ -1362,7 +1363,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
&& !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK | DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS))) {
int pages = 1 << oo_order(oo);
- kmemcheck_alloc_shadow(page, oo_order(oo), flags, node);
+ kmemcheck_alloc_shadow(page, oo_order(oo), alloc_gfp, node);
/*
* Objects from caches that have a constructor don't get
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] slub: fix high order page allocation problem with __GFP_NOFAIL
2014-03-12 8:26 [RESEND PATCH] slub: fix high order page allocation problem with __GFP_NOFAIL Joonsoo Kim
@ 2014-03-13 0:49 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2014-03-13 0:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Christoph Lameter, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
Joonsoo Kim, Andrew Morton, Christian Casteyde
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> SLUB already try to allocate high order page with clearing __GFP_NOFAIL.
> But, when allocating shadow page for kmemcheck, it missed clearing
> the flag. This trigger WARN_ON_ONCE() reported by Christian Casteyde.
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65991
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/3/764
>
> This patch fix this situation by using same allocation flag as original
> allocation.
>
> Reported-by: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-13 0:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-12 8:26 [RESEND PATCH] slub: fix high order page allocation problem with __GFP_NOFAIL Joonsoo Kim
2014-03-13 0:49 ` David Rientjes
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox