linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Debabrata Banerjee <dbanerje@akamai.com>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, fw@strlen.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dbanerje@akamai.com, johunt@akamai.com, jbaron@akamai.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Use cached allocations in place of order-3 allocations for sk_page_frag_refill() and __netdev_alloc_frag()
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:17:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389914224-10453-1-git-send-email-dbanerje@akamai.com> (raw)

This is a hack against 3.10.y to see if using cached allocations works better here. The unintended consequence is in the reference benchmark case, it performs ~7% better than the existing code even with a hacked slower get_page()/put_page(). The intent was to avoid very slow order-3 allocations (and really pathological retries under failure) which can cause lots of problems from OOM killer invocation to direct reclaim/compaction cycles that take up nearly all cpu and end up reaping large amounts of page cache which would have been otherwise useful. This is a regression from the same code that used order-0 allocations since those are easy and fast as they are cached per-cpu, and this code is under very heavy alloc/free behavior. This patch eliminates a majority of that due to slab caching the allocations, though could still be improved by slab holding onto free'd slabs longer; this seems like an unoptimized case when object size == slab size.

vmstat output of bad behavior: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6687527/

This patchset could be fixed for submission by either making another pool of cached frag buffers specifically page_frag (not using slab), or by converting the whole stack to not use get_page/put_page() to reference count and free page allocations so that hacking swap.c is not necessary and slab use normal.

Benchmark:
ifconfig lo mtu 16436
perf record ./netperf -t UDP_STREAM ; perf report

With order-0 allocations:

UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET
Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages                
Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec

262144   65507   10.00      820758      0    43012.26
262144           10.00      820754           43012.05

# Overhead  Command      Shared Object                                      Symbol
# ........  .......  .................  ..........................................
#
    46.15%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] copy_user_generic_string              
     7.89%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] skb_append_datato_frags               
     6.06%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] get_page_from_freelist                
     3.87%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __rmqueue                             
     1.36%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __alloc_pages_nodemask                
     1.11%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] alloc_pages_current                   

linux-3.10.y stock order-3 allocations:

UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET
Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages                
Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec

212992   65507   10.00     1054158      0    55243.69
212992           10.00     1019505           53427.68

# Overhead  Command      Shared Object                                      Symbol
# ........  .......  .................  ..........................................
#
    59.80%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] copy_user_generic_string              
     2.35%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] get_page_from_freelist                
     1.95%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] skb_append_datato_frags               
     1.27%  netperf  [ip_tables]        [k] ipt_do_table                          
     1.26%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] udp_sendmsg                           
     1.03%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] enqueue_task_fair                     
     1.00%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] ip_finish_output                              

With this patchset:

UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET
Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages                
Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec

212992   65507   10.00     1127089      0    59065.70
212992           10.00     1072997           56230.98


# Overhead  Command      Shared Object                                      Symbol
# ........  .......  .................  ..........................................
#
    69.16%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] copy_user_generic_string
     2.56%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] skb_append_datato_frags
     1.00%  netperf  [ip_tables]        [k] ipt_do_table
     0.96%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] sock_alloc_send_pskb
     0.93%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] _raw_spin_lock



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2014-01-16 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-16 23:17 Debabrata Banerjee [this message]
2014-01-16 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Supporting hacks to be able to test slab allocated buffers in place of page_frag without rewriting lots of net code. We make several assumptions here, first that slab allocator is selected. Second, no one is doing get_page or put_page on pages marked PG_slab. Third we allocated all slabs page aligned that we do these calls on Debabrata Banerjee
2014-01-16 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] Use slab allocations for netdev page_frag receive buffers Debabrata Banerjee
2014-01-16 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] Use slab allocations for sk page_frag send buffers Debabrata Banerjee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1389914224-10453-1-git-send-email-dbanerje@akamai.com \
    --to=dbanerje@akamai.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=johunt@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox