From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Figo. zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Matthew R Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] MCS Lock: Barrier corrections
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:16:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383873392.11046.402.camel@schen9-DESK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANN689G2H3goDO3KyO5=CzV7RkTukU-B=KsZpLWV_0=pwzZWpw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 14:43 -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:15:51PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> >> Michel, are you planning to do an implementation of
> >> load-acquire/store-release functions of various architectures?
> >
> > A little something like this:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=138386254111507
> >
> > It so happens we were working on that the past week or so due to another
> > issue ;-)
>
> Haha, awesome, I wasn't aware of this effort.
>
> Tim: my approach would be to provide the acquire/release operations in
> arch-specific include files, and have a default implementation using
> barriers for arches who don't provide these new ops. That way you make
> it work on all arches at once (using the default implementation) and
> make it fast on any arch that cares.
>
> >> Or is the approach of arch specific memory barrier for MCS
> >> an acceptable one before load-acquire and store-release
> >> are available? Are there any technical issues remaining with
> >> the patchset after including including Waiman's arch specific barrier?
>
> I don't want to stand in the way of Waiman's change, and I had
> actually taken the same approach with arch-specific barriers when
> proposing some queue spinlocks in the past; however I do feel that
> this comes back regularly enough that having acquire/release
> primitives available would help, hence my proposal.
>
> That said, earlier in the thread Linus said we should probably get all
> our ducks in a row before going forward with this, so...
>
With the load_acquire and store_release implemented, it should be
pretty straightforward to implement MCS with them. I'll respin
the patch series with these primitives.
Thanks.
Tim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-08 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1383771175.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-06 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] MCS Lock: MCS lock code cleanup and optimizations Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:41 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-11-06 23:55 ` Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-06 21:59 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] MCS Lock: Restructure the MCS lock defines and locking code into its own file Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] MCS Lock: optimizations and extra comments Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:47 ` Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] MCS Lock: Barrier corrections Tim Chen
2013-11-07 1:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-07 4:29 ` Waiman Long
2013-11-07 8:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-07 8:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-07 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-07 9:55 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-07 12:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-07 12:50 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-07 14:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-07 19:59 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-07 21:15 ` Tim Chen
2013-11-07 22:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-07 22:43 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-08 1:16 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] MCS Lock: Make mcs_spinlock.h includable in other files Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:41 ` Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] MCS Lock: Allow architecture specific memory barrier in lock/unlock Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:42 ` Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1383873392.11046.402.camel@schen9-DESK \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=figo1802@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox