linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
	Matthew R Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
	"Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Figo.zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] MCS Lock: Allow architecture specific memory barrier in lock/unlock
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:42:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383774141.11046.359.camel@schen9-DESK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383773836.11046.357.camel@schen9-DESK>

On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 13:37 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> This patch moves the decision of what kind of memory barriers to be
> used in the MCS lock and unlock functions to the architecture specific
> layer. It also moves the actual lock/unlock code to mcs_spinlock.c
> file.
> 
> A full memory barrier will be used if the following macros are not
> defined:
>  1) smp_mb__before_critical_section()
>  2) smp_mb__after_critical_section()
> 
> For the x86 architecture, only compiler barrier will be needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>

Should be Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h |    6 +++
>  include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h   |   78 +-------------------------------------
>  kernel/mcs_spinlock.c          |   81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> index c6cd358..6d0172c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,12 @@
>  #endif
>  #define smp_read_barrier_depends()	read_barrier_depends()
>  #define set_mb(var, value) do { (void)xchg(&var, value); } while (0)
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE)
> +# define smp_mb__before_critical_section()	barrier()
> +# define smp_mb__after_critical_section()	barrier()
> +#endif
> +
>  #else
>  #define smp_mb()	barrier()
>  #define smp_rmb()	barrier()
> diff --git a/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> index f2c71e8..d54bb23 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> @@ -12,19 +12,6 @@
>  #ifndef __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
>  #define __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
>  
> -/*
> - * asm/processor.h may define arch_mutex_cpu_relax().
> - * If it is not defined, cpu_relax() will be used.
> - */
> -#include <asm/barrier.h>
> -#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> -#include <asm/processor.h>
> -#include <linux/compiler.h>
> -
> -#ifndef arch_mutex_cpu_relax
> -# define arch_mutex_cpu_relax() cpu_relax()
> -#endif
> -
>  struct mcs_spinlock {
>  	struct mcs_spinlock *next;
>  	int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */
> @@ -32,68 +19,7 @@ struct mcs_spinlock {
>  
>  extern
>  void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node);
> -
> -/*
> - * In order to acquire the lock, the caller should declare a local node and
> - * pass a reference of the node to this function in addition to the lock.
> - * If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin
> - * on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked
> - * in mcs_spin_unlock().
> - *
> - * The _raw_mcs_spin_lock() function should not be called directly. Instead,
> - * users should call mcs_spin_lock().
> - */
> -static inline
> -void _raw_mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> -{
> -	struct mcs_spinlock *prev;
> -
> -	/* Init node */
> -	node->locked = 0;
> -	node->next   = NULL;
> -
> -	/* xchg() provides a memory barrier */
> -	prev = xchg(lock, node);
> -	if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
> -		/* Lock acquired */
> -		return;
> -	}
> -	ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
> -	/* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */
> -	while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked))
> -		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> -
> -	/* Make sure subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired */
> -	smp_rmb();
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Releases the lock. The caller should pass in the corresponding node that
> - * was used to acquire the lock.
> - */
> -static inline
> -void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> -{
> -	struct mcs_spinlock *next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next);
> -
> -	if (likely(!next)) {
> -		/*
> -		 * cmpxchg() provides a memory barrier.
> -		 * Release the lock by setting it to NULL
> -		 */
> -		if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
> -			return;
> -		/* Wait until the next pointer is set */
> -		while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))
> -			arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> -	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * Make sure all operations within the critical section
> -		 * happen before the lock is released.
> -		 */
> -		smp_wmb();
> -	}
> -	ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
> -}
> +extern
> +void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node);
>  
>  #endif /* __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/mcs_spinlock.c b/kernel/mcs_spinlock.c
> index 3c55626..2dfd207 100644
> --- a/kernel/mcs_spinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/mcs_spinlock.c
> @@ -7,15 +7,90 @@
>   * It avoids expensive cache bouncings that common test-and-set spin-lock
>   * implementations incur.
>   */
> +/*
> + * asm/processor.h may define arch_mutex_cpu_relax().
> + * If it is not defined, cpu_relax() will be used.
> + */
> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> +#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/mcs_spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  
> +#ifndef arch_mutex_cpu_relax
> +# define arch_mutex_cpu_relax() cpu_relax()
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
> - * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
> - * time spent in this lock function.
> + * Fall back to use full memory barrier if those macros are not defined
> + * in a architecture specific header file.
> + */
> +#ifndef smp_mb__before_critical_section
> +#define	smp_mb__before_critical_section()	smp_mb()
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef smp_mb__after_critical_section
> +#define	smp_mb__after_critical_section()	smp_mb()
> +#endif
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * In order to acquire the lock, the caller should declare a local node and
> + * pass a reference of the node to this function in addition to the lock.
> + * If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin
> + * on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked
> + * in mcs_spin_unlock().
>   */
>  void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
>  {
> -	_raw_mcs_spin_lock(lock, node);
> +	struct mcs_spinlock *prev;
> +
> +	/* Init node */
> +	node->locked = 0;
> +	node->next   = NULL;
> +
> +	/* xchg() provides a memory barrier */
> +	prev = xchg(lock, node);
> +	if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
> +		/* Lock acquired */
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
> +	/* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */
> +	while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked))
> +		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> +
> +	/* Make sure subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired */
> +	smp_mb__before_critical_section();
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mcs_spin_lock);
> +
> +/*
> + * Releases the lock. The caller should pass in the corresponding node that
> + * was used to acquire the lock.
> + */
> +void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> +{
> +	struct mcs_spinlock *next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next);
> +
> +	if (likely(!next)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * cmpxchg() provides a memory barrier.
> +		 * Release the lock by setting it to NULL
> +		 */
> +		if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
> +			return;
> +		/* Wait until the next pointer is set */
> +		while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))
> +			arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Make sure all operations within the critical section
> +		 * happen before the lock is released.
> +		 */
> +		smp_mb__after_critical_section();
> +	}
> +	ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mcs_spin_unlock);


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2013-11-06 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1383771175.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-06 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] MCS Lock: MCS lock code cleanup and optimizations Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:41   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-11-06 23:55     ` Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:42   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-06 21:59     ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] MCS Lock: Restructure the MCS lock defines and locking code into its own file Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] MCS Lock: optimizations and extra comments Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:47   ` Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] MCS Lock: Barrier corrections Tim Chen
2013-11-07  1:39   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-07  4:29     ` Waiman Long
2013-11-07  8:13     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-07  8:22       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-07  8:25         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-07  9:55     ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-07 12:06       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-07 12:50         ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-07 14:31           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-07 19:59             ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-07 21:15               ` Tim Chen
2013-11-07 22:21                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-07 22:43                   ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-08  1:16                     ` Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] MCS Lock: Make mcs_spinlock.h includable in other files Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:41   ` Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] MCS Lock: Allow architecture specific memory barrier in lock/unlock Tim Chen
2013-11-06 21:42   ` Tim Chen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1383774141.11046.359.camel@schen9-DESK \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
    --cc=figo1802@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox