From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
aswin@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm,fs: introduce helpers around i_mmap_mutex
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:28:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380850082.2280.18.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380834035.2280.5.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 14:00 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 13:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:17:45 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Various parts of the kernel acquire and release this mutex,
> > > so add i_mmap_lock_write() and immap_unlock_write() helper
> > > functions that will encapsulate this logic. The next patch
> > > will make use of these.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > @@ -478,6 +478,16 @@ struct block_device {
> > >
> > > int mapping_tagged(struct address_space *mapping, int tag);
> > >
> > > +static inline void i_mmap_lock_write(struct address_space *mapping)
> > > +{
> > > + mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> > > +}
> >
> > I don't understand the thinking behind the "_write". There is no
> > "_read" and all callsites use "_write", so why not call it
> > i_mmap_lock()?
> >
> > I *assume* the answer is "so we can later convert some sites to a new
> > i_mmap_lock_read()". If so, the changelog should have discussed this.
> > If not, still confused.
> >
>
> Yes, that's exactly right. I'll resend with an updated changelog.
So here's an updated changelog, I left it generic enough for us not to
rely on the lock type characteristics, since if/when changed, it can
remain a sleeping lock (rwsem) or not, for rwlock_t.
8<-----------------------------------------
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm,fs: introduce helpers around i_mmap_mutex
Various parts of the kernel acquire and release this mutex,
so add i_mmap_lock_write() and immap_unlock_write() helper
functions that will encapsulate this logic. The next patch
will make use of these.
Note that since this lock is currently a mutex, only introduce
write related functions. In the future, the lock type can be
changed and reading semantics can be added such that the lock
can be shared when allowed.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 3f40547..b32e64f 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -478,6 +478,16 @@ struct block_device {
int mapping_tagged(struct address_space *mapping, int tag);
+static inline void i_mmap_lock_write(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
+}
+
+static inline void i_mmap_unlock_write(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
+}
+
/*
* Might pages of this file be mapped into userspace?
*/
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-04 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 20:17 [PATCH 0/2] fs,mm: abstract i_mmap_mutex lock Davidlohr Bueso
2013-10-02 20:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm,fs: introduce helpers around i_mmap_mutex Davidlohr Bueso
2013-10-03 20:58 ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-03 21:00 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-10-04 1:28 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2013-10-02 20:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs,mm: use new helper functions around the i_mmap_mutex Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380850082.2280.18.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net \
--to=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox