From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com (mail-pb0-f43.google.com [209.85.160.43]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6766B0031 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:30:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md4so5196272pbc.2 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] rwsem: check the lock before cpmxchg in down_write_trylock From: Tim Chen In-Reply-To: References: <1380061346.3467.50.camel@schen9-DESK> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:30:19 -0700 Message-ID: <1380065419.3467.59.camel@schen9-DESK> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Jason Low Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Alex Shi , Andi Kleen , Michel Lespinasse , Davidlohr Bueso , Matthew R Wilcox , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , Peter Hurley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 16:22 -0700, Jason Low wrote: > Should we do something similar with __down_read_trylock, such as > the following? > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Low > --- > include/asm-generic/rwsem.h | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h > index bb1e2cd..47990dc 100644 > --- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h > @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct > rw_semaphore *sem) > long tmp; > > while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) { > + if (sem->count != tmp) > + continue; > + Considering that tmp has just been assigned the value of sem->count, the added if check failure is unlikely and probably not needed. We should proceed to cmpxchg below. > if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp, > tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) { > return 1; Tim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org