From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx191.postini.com [74.125.245.191]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F26F56B005C for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 05:32:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Mel Gorman Subject: [PATCH 15/50] sched: numa: Correct adjustment of numa_scan_period Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:31:55 +0100 Message-Id: <1378805550-29949-16-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1378805550-29949-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> References: <1378805550-29949-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel Cc: Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML , Mel Gorman numa_scan_period is in milliseconds, not jiffies. Properly placed pages slow the scanning rate but adding 10 jiffies to numa_scan_period means that the rate scanning slows depends on HZ which is confusing. Get rid of the jiffies_to_msec conversion and treat it as ms. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 23fd1f3..29ba117 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ void task_numa_fault(int node, int pages, bool migrated) p->numa_scan_period_max = task_scan_max(p); p->numa_scan_period = min(p->numa_scan_period_max, - p->numa_scan_period + jiffies_to_msecs(10)); + p->numa_scan_period + 10); } task_numa_placement(p); -- 1.8.1.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org