From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
gong.chen@linux.intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm/hwpoison: fix num_poisoned_pages error statistics for thp
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:43:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377189788-xv5ewgmb-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377164907-24801-3-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:48:24PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> There is a race between hwpoison page and unpoison page, memory_failure
> set the page hwpoison and increase num_poisoned_pages without hold page
> lock, and one page count will be accounted against thp for num_poisoned_pages.
> However, unpoison can occur before memory_failure hold page lock and
> split transparent hugepage, unpoison will decrease num_poisoned_pages
> by 1 << compound_order since memory_failure has not yet split transparent
> hugepage with page lock held. That means we account one page for hwpoison
> and 1 << compound_order for unpoison. This patch fix it by decrease one
> account for num_poisoned_pages against no hugetlbfs pages case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I think that a thp never becomes hwpoisoned without splitting, so "trying
to unpoison thp" never happens (I think that this implicit fact should be
commented somewhere or asserted with VM_BUG_ON().)
And nr_pages in unpoison_memory() can be greater than 1 for hugetlbfs page.
So does this patch break counting when unpoisoning free hugetlbfs pages?
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 5092e06..6bfd51e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
> return 0;
> }
> if (TestClearPageHWPoison(p))
> - atomic_long_sub(nr_pages, &num_poisoned_pages);
> + atomic_long_dec(&num_poisoned_pages);
> pr_info("MCE: Software-unpoisoned free page %#lx\n", pfn);
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 9:48 [PATCH 1/6] mm/hwpoison: fix lose PG_dirty flag for errors on mlocked pages Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 9:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/hwpoison: don't need to hold compound lock for hugetlbfs page Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 15:52 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-22 23:54 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 23:54 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 9:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/hwpoison: fix num_poisoned_pages error statistics for thp Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 16:43 ` Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2013-08-22 17:00 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-22 23:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 23:52 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <5216a46f.a800310a.2351.ffffa95cSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-08-23 3:27 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-23 4:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-23 4:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 9:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/hwpoison: don't set migration type twice to avoid hold heavy contend zone->lock Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 19:06 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-23 0:15 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-23 0:15 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 9:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/hwpoison: drop forward reference declarations __soft_offline_page() Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 19:24 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-22 9:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/hwpoison: centralize set PG_hwpoison flag and increase num_poisoned_pages Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 20:13 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-23 0:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-23 0:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 15:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/hwpoison: fix lose PG_dirty flag for errors on mlocked pages Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-22 23:34 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-08-22 23:34 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1377189788-xv5ewgmb-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--to=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox