From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx194.postini.com [74.125.245.194]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A693E6B0034 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:44:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:43:52 -0400 From: Naoya Horiguchi Message-ID: <1375289032-ksc4vltc-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> In-Reply-To: <20130731051221.GK2548@lge.com> References: <1375075929-6119-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <1375075929-6119-16-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <1375124737-9w10y4c4-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <1375125555-yuwxqz39-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <20130731051221.GK2548@lge.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] mm, hugetlb: move up anon_vma_prepare() Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Hugh Dickins , Davidlohr Bueso , David Gibson , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li , Hillf Danton On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:12:21PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:19:15PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:05:37PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:32:06PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > If we fail with a allocated hugepage, it is hard to recover properly. > > > > One such example is reserve count. We don't have any method to recover > > > > reserve count. Although, I will introduce a function to recover reserve > > > > count in following patch, it is better not to allocate a hugepage > > > > as much as possible. So move up anon_vma_prepare() which can be failed > > > > in OOM situation. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi > > > > Sorry, let me suspend this Reviewed for a question. > > If alloc_huge_page failed after we succeeded anon_vma_parepare, > > the allocated anon_vma_chain and/or anon_vma are safely freed? > > Or don't we have to free them? > > Yes, it will be freed by free_pgtables() and then unlink_anon_vmas() > when a task terminate. So, we don't have to free them. OK, thanks for clarification. Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org