linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	azurIt <azurit@pobox.sk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 4/6] x86: finish user fault error path with fatal signal
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:25:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374791138-15665-5-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374791138-15665-1-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>

The x86 fault handler bails in the middle of error handling when the
task has a fatal signal pending.  For a subsequent patch this is a
problem in OOM situations because it relies on
pagefault_out_of_memory() being called even when the task has been
killed, to perform proper per-task OOM state unwinding.

Shortcutting the fault like this is a rather minor optimization that
saves a few instructions in rare cases.  Just remove it for
user-triggered faults.

Use the opportunity to split the fault retry handling from actual
fault errors and add locking documentation that reads suprisingly
similar to ARM's.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 6d77c38..3aaeffc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -842,23 +842,15 @@ do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long address,
 	force_sig_info_fault(SIGBUS, code, address, tsk, fault);
 }
 
-static noinline int
+static noinline void
 mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	       unsigned long address, unsigned int fault)
 {
-	/*
-	 * Pagefault was interrupted by SIGKILL. We have no reason to
-	 * continue pagefault.
-	 */
-	if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
-		if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY))
-			up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
-		if (!(error_code & PF_USER))
-			no_context(regs, error_code, address, 0, 0);
-		return 1;
+	if (fatal_signal_pending(current) && !(error_code & PF_USER)) {
+		up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+		no_context(regs, error_code, address, 0, 0);
+		return;
 	}
-	if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR))
-		return 0;
 
 	if (fault & VM_FAULT_OOM) {
 		/* Kernel mode? Handle exceptions or die: */
@@ -866,7 +858,7 @@ mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 			up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
 			no_context(regs, error_code, address,
 				   SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR);
-			return 1;
+			return;
 		}
 
 		up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
@@ -884,7 +876,6 @@ mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		else
 			BUG();
 	}
-	return 1;
 }
 
 static int spurious_fault_check(unsigned long error_code, pte_t *pte)
@@ -1189,9 +1180,17 @@ good_area:
 	 */
 	fault = handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, address, flags);
 
-	if (unlikely(fault & (VM_FAULT_RETRY|VM_FAULT_ERROR))) {
-		if (mm_fault_error(regs, error_code, address, fault))
-			return;
+	/*
+	 * If we need to retry but a fatal signal is pending, handle the
+	 * signal first. We do not need to release the mmap_sem because it
+	 * would already be released in __lock_page_or_retry in mm/filemap.c.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely((fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) && fatal_signal_pending(current)))
+		return;
+
+	if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) {
+		mm_fault_error(regs, error_code, address, fault);
+		return;
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-25 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-25 22:25 [patch 0/6] improve memcg oom killer robustness Johannes Weiner
2013-07-25 22:25 ` [patch 1/6] arch: mm: remove obsolete init OOM protection Johannes Weiner
2013-07-26 13:00   ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-29 18:55   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-07-25 22:25 ` [patch 2/6] arch: mm: do not invoke OOM killer on kernel fault OOM Johannes Weiner
2013-07-26 13:07   ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-29 18:58   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-08-01 21:59     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-25 22:25 ` [patch 3/6] arch: mm: pass userspace fault flag to generic fault handler Johannes Weiner
2013-07-26 13:19   ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-26 18:45     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-25 22:25 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2013-07-26 13:52   ` [patch 4/6] x86: finish user fault error path with fatal signal Michal Hocko
2013-07-26 18:46     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-29 12:45       ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-29 19:01   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-07-25 22:25 ` [patch 5/6] mm: memcg: enable memcg OOM killer only for user faults Johannes Weiner
2013-07-26 14:16   ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-26 18:54     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-29 19:18   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-07-29 19:44     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-29 19:47       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-07-25 22:25 ` [patch 6/6] mm: memcg: do not trap chargers with full callstack on OOM Johannes Weiner
2013-07-26 14:43   ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-26 21:28     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-29 14:12       ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-29 14:55         ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-29 15:52           ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-30 14:09       ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-30 14:32         ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-30 14:56           ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-25 22:31 ` [patch 3.2] memcg OOM robustness (x86 only) Johannes Weiner
2013-08-03  8:38   ` azurIt
2013-08-03 16:30     ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1374791138-15665-5-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=azurit@pobox.sk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox