From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx139.postini.com [74.125.245.139]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CE886B0032 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:00:21 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rwsem: do optimistic spinning for writer lock acquisition From: Tim Chen In-Reply-To: <20130625073739.GX28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1371858700.22432.5.camel@schen9-DESK> <51C558E2.1040108@hurleysoftware.com> <1372017836.1797.14.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1372093876.22432.34.camel@schen9-DESK> <51C894C3.4040407@hurleysoftware.com> <1372105065.22432.65.camel@schen9-DESK> <20130625073739.GX28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:00:06 -0700 Message-ID: <1372176006.22432.96.camel@schen9-DESK> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Peter Hurley , Davidlohr Bueso , Alex Shi , Michel Lespinasse , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Andi Kleen , Matthew R Wilcox , Dave Hansen , Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 09:37 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:17:45PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote: > > On second thought, I agree with you. I should change this to > > something like > > > > int retval = true; > > task_struct *sem_owner; > > > > /* Spin only if active writer running */ > > if (!sem->owner) > > return false; > > > > rcu_read_lock(); > > sem_owner = sem->owner; > > That should be: sem_owner = ACCESS_ONCE(sem->owner); to make sure the > compiler doesn't try and be clever and rereads. Thanks. Will incorporate this in next version of the patch. Tim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org