linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, "Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
	"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Performance regression from switching lock to rw-sem for anon-vma tree
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:53:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371660831.27102.663.camel@schen9-DESK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130619131611.GC24957@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 15:16 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > vmstat for mutex implementation: 
> > procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu-----
> >  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa st
> > 38  0      0 130957920  47860 199956    0    0     0    56 236342 476975 14 72 14  0  0
> > 41  0      0 130938560  47860 219900    0    0     0     0 236816 479676 14 72 14  0  0
> > 
> > vmstat for rw-sem implementation (3.10-rc4)
> > procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu-----
> >  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa st
> > 40  0      0 130933984  43232 202584    0    0     0     0 321817 690741 13 71 16  0  0
> > 39  0      0 130913904  43232 224812    0    0     0     0 322193 692949 13 71 16  0  0
> 
> It appears the main difference is that the rwsem variant context-switches 
> about 36% more than the mutex version, right?
> 
> I'm wondering how that's possible - the lock is mostly write-locked, 
> correct? So the lock-stealing from Davidlohr Bueso and Michel Lespinasse 
> ought to have brought roughly the same lock-stealing behavior as mutexes 
> do, right?
> 
> So the next analytical step would be to figure out why rwsem lock-stealing 
> is not behaving in an equivalent fashion on this workload. Do readers come 
> in frequently enough to disrupt write-lock-stealing perhaps?
> 
> Context-switch call-graph profiling might shed some light on where the 
> extra context switches come from...
> 
> Something like:
> 
>   perf record -g -e sched:sched_switch --filter 'prev_state != 0' -a sleep 1
> 
> or a variant thereof might do the trick.
> 

Ingo,

It appears that we are having much more down write failure causing a process to
block vs going to the slow path for the mutex case.

Here's the profile data from
perf record -g -e sched:sched_switch --filter 'prev_state != 0' -a sleep 1

3.10-rc4 (mutex implementation context switch profile)

-  59.51%             exim  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] perf_trace_sched_switch
   - perf_trace_sched_switch
   - __schedule
      - 99.98% schedule
         + 33.07% schedule_timeout
         + 23.84% pipe_wait
         + 20.24% do_wait
         + 12.37% do_exit
         + 5.34% sigsuspend
         - 3.40% schedule_preempt_disabled
              __mutex_lock_common.clone.8
              __mutex_lock_slowpath
            - mutex_lock                   <---------low rate mutex blocking
               + 65.71% lock_anon_vma_root.clone.24
               + 19.03% anon_vma_lock.clone.21
               + 7.14% dup_mm
               + 5.36% unlink_file_vma
               + 1.71% ima_file_check
               + 0.64% generic_file_aio_write
         - 1.07% rwsem_down_write_failed
              call_rwsem_down_write_failed
              exit_shm
              do_exit
              do_group_exit
              SyS_exit_group
              system_call_fastpath
-  27.61%           smtpbm  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] perf_trace_sched_switch
   - perf_trace_sched_switch
   - __schedule
   - schedule
   - schedule_timeout
      + 100.00% sk_wait_data
+   0.46%          swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] perf_trace_sched_switch


----------------------
3.10-rc4 implementation (rw-sem context switch profile)

81.91%             exim  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] perf_trace_sched_switch
- perf_trace_sched_switch
- __schedule
   - 99.99% schedule
      - 65.26% rwsem_down_write_failed   <------High write lock blocking
         - call_rwsem_down_write_failed
            - 79.36% lock_anon_vma_root.clone.27
               + 52.64% unlink_anon_vmas
               + 47.36% anon_vma_clone
            + 12.16% anon_vma_fork
            + 8.00% anon_vma_free
      + 11.96% schedule_timeout
      + 7.66% do_exit
      + 7.61% do_wait
      + 5.49% pipe_wait
      + 1.82% sigsuspend
13.55%           smtpbm  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] perf_trace_sched_switch
- perf_trace_sched_switch
- __schedule
- schedule
- schedule_timeout
 0.11%        rcu_sched  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] perf_trace_sched_switch


Thanks.

Tim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-19 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-13 23:26 Tim Chen
2013-06-19 13:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-19 16:53   ` Tim Chen [this message]
2013-06-26  0:19     ` Tim Chen
2013-06-26  9:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 21:36         ` Tim Chen
2013-06-27  0:25           ` Tim Chen
2013-06-27  8:36             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-27 20:53               ` Tim Chen
2013-06-27 23:31                 ` Tim Chen
2013-06-28  9:38                   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-28 21:04                     ` Tim Chen
2013-06-29  7:12                       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-01 20:28                         ` Tim Chen
2013-07-02  6:45                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-16 17:53                             ` Tim Chen
2013-07-23  9:45                               ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-23  9:51                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-23  9:53                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-30  0:13                                     ` Tim Chen
2013-07-30 19:24                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-05 22:08                                         ` Tim Chen
2013-07-30 19:59                                       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-30 20:34                                         ` Tim Chen
2013-07-30 21:45                                           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 23:55                                       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-07  0:56                                         ` Tim Chen
2013-08-12 18:52                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-12 20:10                                             ` Tim Chen
2013-06-28  9:20                 ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found] <1371165333.27102.568.camel@schen9-DESK>
     [not found] ` <1371167015.1754.14.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
2013-06-14 16:09   ` Tim Chen
2013-06-14 22:31     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-14 22:44       ` Tim Chen
2013-06-14 22:47       ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-06-17 22:27         ` Tim Chen
2013-06-16  9:50   ` Alex Shi
2013-06-17 16:22     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-17 18:45       ` Tim Chen
2013-06-17 19:05         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-17 22:28           ` Tim Chen
2013-06-17 23:18         ` Alex Shi
2013-06-17 23:20       ` Alex Shi
2013-06-17 23:35         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-18  0:08           ` Tim Chen
2013-06-19 23:11             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-19 23:24               ` Tim Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1371660831.27102.663.camel@schen9-DESK \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox