From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx150.postini.com [74.125.245.150]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 055A16B003B for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:27:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Tang Chen Subject: [Part1 PATCH v5 15/22] x86, mm, numa: Move node_possible_map setting later Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:03:02 +0800 Message-Id: <1371128589-8953-16-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1371128589-8953-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1371128589-8953-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, trenn@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org From: Yinghai Lu Move node_possible_map handling out of numa_check_memblks() to avoid side effect when changing numa_check_memblks(). Only set node_possible_map once for successful path instead of resetting in numa_init() every time. Suggested-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Reviewed-by: Tang Chen Tested-by: Tang Chen --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index e448b6f..da2ebab 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -536,12 +536,13 @@ static unsigned long __init node_map_pfn_alignment(struct numa_meminfo *mi) static int __init numa_check_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi) { + nodemask_t nodes_parsed; unsigned long pfn_align; /* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */ - node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed; - numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&node_possible_map, mi); - if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map))) + nodes_parsed = numa_nodes_parsed; + numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&nodes_parsed, mi); + if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(nodes_parsed))) return -EINVAL; if (!numa_meminfo_cover_memory(mi)) @@ -593,7 +594,6 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void)) set_apicid_to_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE); nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed); - nodes_clear(node_possible_map); memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo)); numa_reset_distance(); @@ -669,6 +669,9 @@ void __init x86_numa_init(void) early_x86_numa_init(); + node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed; + numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(&node_possible_map, mi); + for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) { struct numa_memblk *mb = &mi->blk[i]; memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, mb->nid); -- 1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org