linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: [patch -v4 6/8] memcg, vmscan: Do not attempt soft limit reclaim if it would not scan anything
Date: Mon,  3 Jun 2013 12:18:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370254735-13012-7-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370254735-13012-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>

mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim controls whether soft reclaim pass is
done and it always says yes currently. Memcg iterators are clever to
skip nodes that are not soft reclaimable quite efficiently but
mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim can be more clever and do not start the
soft reclaim pass at all if it knows that nothing would be scanned
anyway.

In order to do that, simply reuse mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible for
the target group of the reclaim and allow the pass only if the whole
subtree wouldn't be skipped.

Changes since v1
- do not export mem_cgroup_root and teach mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible
  to handle NULL memcg as mem_cgroup_root

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |    6 +++++-
 mm/vmscan.c     |    4 +++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 90495d5..8ff9366 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1941,7 +1941,11 @@ enum mem_cgroup_filter_t
 mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		struct mem_cgroup *root)
 {
-	struct mem_cgroup *parent = memcg;
+	struct mem_cgroup *parent;
+
+	if (!memcg)
+		memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
+	parent = memcg;
 
 	if (res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&memcg->res))
 		return VISIT;
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 10bcbc2..dc78f07 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -142,7 +142,9 @@ static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 
 static bool mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 {
-	return !mem_cgroup_disabled();
+	struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
+	return !mem_cgroup_disabled() &&
+		mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible(root, root) != SKIP_TREE;
 }
 #else
 static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-03 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-03 10:18 [patch v4] Soft limit rework Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 1/8] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 2/8] memcg: Get rid of soft-limit tree infrastructure Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 3/8] vmscan, memcg: Do softlimit reclaim also for targeted reclaim Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 4/8] memcg: enhance memcg iterator to support predicates Michal Hocko
2013-06-04  1:07   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-04 13:45     ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 19:36       ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-04 20:48         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 20:54           ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05  7:37             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-05  8:05               ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05  8:52                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-05  8:58                   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05  9:07                     ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-05  9:09                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-07  0:48                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-07  8:25                           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-10  7:48   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 5/8] memcg: track children in soft limit excess to improve soft limit Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 7/8] memcg: Track all children over limit in the root Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 8/8] memcg, vmscan: do not fall into reclaim-all pass too quickly Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 16:27 ` [patch v4] Soft limit rework Balbir Singh
2013-06-04 16:38   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 17:57     ` Balbir Singh
2013-06-04 18:08       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-11 15:43 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-17 14:01   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1370254735-13012-7-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox