From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: [patch v3 -mm 2/3] memcg: Get rid of soft-limit tree infrastructure
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:46:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368431172-6844-3-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368431172-6844-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>
Now that the soft limit is integrated to the reclaim directly the whole
soft-limit tree infrastructure is not needed anymore. Rip it out.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 224 +------------------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 223 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 7e5d7a9..1223aaa 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
#include <linux/limits.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
-#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/swapops.h>
@@ -137,7 +136,6 @@ static const char * const mem_cgroup_lru_names[] = {
*/
enum mem_cgroup_events_target {
MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT,
MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO,
MEM_CGROUP_NTARGETS,
};
@@ -173,10 +171,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter reclaim_iter[DEF_PRIORITY + 1];
- struct rb_node tree_node; /* RB tree node */
- unsigned long long usage_in_excess;/* Set to the value by which */
- /* the soft limit is exceeded*/
- bool on_tree;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg; /* Back pointer, we cannot */
/* use container_of */
};
@@ -189,26 +183,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup_lru_info {
struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[0];
};
-/*
- * Cgroups above their limits are maintained in a RB-Tree, independent of
- * their hierarchy representation
- */
-
-struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone {
- struct rb_root rb_root;
- spinlock_t lock;
-};
-
-struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node {
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone rb_tree_per_zone[MAX_NR_ZONES];
-};
-
-struct mem_cgroup_tree {
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *rb_tree_per_node[MAX_NUMNODES];
-};
-
-static struct mem_cgroup_tree soft_limit_tree __read_mostly;
-
struct mem_cgroup_threshold {
struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd;
u64 threshold;
@@ -533,7 +507,6 @@ static bool move_file(void)
* limit reclaim to prevent infinite loops, if they ever occur.
*/
#define MEM_CGROUP_MAX_RECLAIM_LOOPS 100
-#define MEM_CGROUP_MAX_SOFT_LIMIT_RECLAIM_LOOPS 2
enum charge_type {
MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE = 0,
@@ -764,164 +737,6 @@ page_cgroup_zoneinfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
return mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
}
-static struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *
-soft_limit_tree_node_zone(int nid, int zid)
-{
- return &soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[nid]->rb_tree_per_zone[zid];
-}
-
-static struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *
-soft_limit_tree_from_page(struct page *page)
-{
- int nid = page_to_nid(page);
- int zid = page_zonenum(page);
-
- return &soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[nid]->rb_tree_per_zone[zid];
-}
-
-static void
-__mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz,
- unsigned long long new_usage_in_excess)
-{
- struct rb_node **p = &mctz->rb_root.rb_node;
- struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz_node;
-
- if (mz->on_tree)
- return;
-
- mz->usage_in_excess = new_usage_in_excess;
- if (!mz->usage_in_excess)
- return;
- while (*p) {
- parent = *p;
- mz_node = rb_entry(parent, struct mem_cgroup_per_zone,
- tree_node);
- if (mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess)
- p = &(*p)->rb_left;
- /*
- * We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft
- * limit by the same amount
- */
- else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess)
- p = &(*p)->rb_right;
- }
- rb_link_node(&mz->tree_node, parent, p);
- rb_insert_color(&mz->tree_node, &mctz->rb_root);
- mz->on_tree = true;
-}
-
-static void
-__mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
-{
- if (!mz->on_tree)
- return;
- rb_erase(&mz->tree_node, &mctz->rb_root);
- mz->on_tree = false;
-}
-
-static void
-mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz,
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
-{
- spin_lock(&mctz->lock);
- __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(memcg, mz, mctz);
- spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
-}
-
-
-static void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
-{
- unsigned long long excess;
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz;
- int nid = page_to_nid(page);
- int zid = page_zonenum(page);
- mctz = soft_limit_tree_from_page(page);
-
- /*
- * Necessary to update all ancestors when hierarchy is used.
- * because their event counter is not touched.
- */
- for (; memcg; memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) {
- mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
- excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&memcg->res);
- /*
- * We have to update the tree if mz is on RB-tree or
- * mem is over its softlimit.
- */
- if (excess || mz->on_tree) {
- spin_lock(&mctz->lock);
- /* if on-tree, remove it */
- if (mz->on_tree)
- __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(memcg, mz, mctz);
- /*
- * Insert again. mz->usage_in_excess will be updated.
- * If excess is 0, no tree ops.
- */
- __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(memcg, mz, mctz, excess);
- spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
- }
- }
-}
-
-static void mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
-{
- int node, zone;
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz;
-
- for_each_node(node) {
- for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
- mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, node, zone);
- mctz = soft_limit_tree_node_zone(node, zone);
- mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(memcg, mz, mctz);
- }
- }
-}
-
-static struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *
-__mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
-{
- struct rb_node *rightmost = NULL;
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
-
-retry:
- mz = NULL;
- rightmost = rb_last(&mctz->rb_root);
- if (!rightmost)
- goto done; /* Nothing to reclaim from */
-
- mz = rb_entry(rightmost, struct mem_cgroup_per_zone, tree_node);
- /*
- * Remove the node now but someone else can add it back,
- * we will to add it back at the end of reclaim to its correct
- * position in the tree.
- */
- __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz->memcg, mz, mctz);
- if (!res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&mz->memcg->res) ||
- !css_tryget(&mz->memcg->css))
- goto retry;
-done:
- return mz;
-}
-
-static struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *
-mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz)
-{
- struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
-
- spin_lock(&mctz->lock);
- mz = __mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(mctz);
- spin_unlock(&mctz->lock);
- return mz;
-}
-
/*
* Implementation Note: reading percpu statistics for memcg.
*
@@ -1075,9 +890,6 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH:
next = val + THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_TARGET;
break;
- case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT:
- next = val + SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_TARGET;
- break;
case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO:
next = val + NUMAINFO_EVENTS_TARGET;
break;
@@ -1100,11 +912,8 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
/* threshold event is triggered in finer grain than soft limit */
if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
- bool do_softlimit;
bool do_numainfo __maybe_unused;
- do_softlimit = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
do_numainfo = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO);
@@ -1112,8 +921,6 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
preempt_enable();
mem_cgroup_threshold(memcg);
- if (unlikely(do_softlimit))
- mem_cgroup_update_tree(memcg, page);
#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
if (unlikely(do_numainfo))
atomic_inc(&memcg->numainfo_events);
@@ -2955,9 +2762,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
/*
- * "charge_statistics" updated event counter. Then, check it.
- * Insert ancestor (and ancestor's ancestors), to softlimit RB-tree.
- * if they exceeds softlimit.
+ * "charge_statistics" updated event counter.
*/
memcg_check_events(memcg, page);
}
@@ -6086,8 +5891,6 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node)
for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
mz = &pn->zoneinfo[zone];
lruvec_init(&mz->lruvec);
- mz->usage_in_excess = 0;
- mz->on_tree = false;
mz->memcg = memcg;
}
memcg->info.nodeinfo[node] = pn;
@@ -6143,7 +5946,6 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
int node;
size_t size = memcg_size();
- mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(memcg);
free_css_id(&mem_cgroup_subsys, &memcg->css);
for_each_node(node)
@@ -6225,29 +6027,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(parent_mem_cgroup);
-static void __init mem_cgroup_soft_limit_tree_init(void)
-{
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *rtpn;
- struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *rtpz;
- int tmp, node, zone;
-
- for_each_node(node) {
- tmp = node;
- if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
- tmp = -1;
- rtpn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rtpn), GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
- BUG_ON(!rtpn);
-
- soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[node] = rtpn;
-
- for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
- rtpz = &rtpn->rb_tree_per_zone[zone];
- rtpz->rb_root = RB_ROOT;
- spin_lock_init(&rtpz->lock);
- }
- }
-}
-
static struct cgroup_subsys_state * __ref
mem_cgroup_css_alloc(struct cgroup *cont)
{
@@ -7040,7 +6819,6 @@ static int __init mem_cgroup_init(void)
{
hotcpu_notifier(memcg_cpu_hotplug_callback, 0);
enable_swap_cgroup();
- mem_cgroup_soft_limit_tree_init();
memcg_stock_init();
return 0;
}
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 7:46 [patch v3 0/3 -mm] Soft limit rework Michal Hocko
2013-05-13 7:46 ` [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Michal Hocko
2013-05-15 8:34 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 22:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-16 22:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17 7:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-17 7:12 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-17 16:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-05-17 16:57 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17 17:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-05-17 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-20 14:44 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-21 6:53 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] memcg: track children in soft limit excess to improve soft limit Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] memcg, vmscan: Do not attempt soft limit reclaim if it would not scan anything Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] memcg: Track all children over limit in the root Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:20 ` [PATCH] memcg: enhance memcg iterator to support predicates Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 13:05 ` [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 15:57 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 20:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-05-30 8:45 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 14:54 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-30 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-13 7:46 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-05-15 8:38 ` [patch v3 -mm 2/3] memcg: Get rid of soft-limit tree infrastructure Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 22:16 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-13 7:46 ` [patch v3 -mm 3/3] vmscan, memcg: Do softlimit reclaim also for targeted reclaim Michal Hocko
2013-05-15 8:42 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-17 7:50 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-16 23:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17 7:34 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1368431172-6844-3-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox