From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Dave Shrinnker <david@fromorbit.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hughd@google.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 21/32] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 18:00:48 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365429659-22108-22-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365429659-22108-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.
Future patches will implement the in-shrinker logic to filter objects
based on its memcg association.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
include/linux/shrinker.h | 4 ++++
mm/memcontrol.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
mm/vmscan.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index d6183f0..4c24249 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head);
bool mem_cgroup_bad_page_check(struct page *page);
void mem_cgroup_print_bad_page(struct page *page);
#endif
+
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone);
#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
struct mem_cgroup;
@@ -377,6 +380,12 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_replace_page_cache(struct page *oldpage,
struct page *newpage)
{
}
+
+static inline unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
#if !defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) || !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)
@@ -429,6 +438,8 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
return static_key_false(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
}
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
/*
* In general, we'll do everything in our power to not incur in any overhead
* for non-memcg users for the kmem functions. Not even a function call, if we
@@ -562,6 +573,12 @@ memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
return __memcg_kmem_get_cache(cachep, gfp);
}
#else
+
+static inline bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
#define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \
for (; NULL; )
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index d4636a0..4e9e53b 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ struct shrink_control {
/* shrink from these nodes */
nodemask_t nodes_to_scan;
+
+ /* reclaim from this memcg only (if not NULL) */
+ struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
};
/*
@@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ struct shrinker {
int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
long batch; /* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
+ bool memcg_shrinker; /* memcg-aware shrinker */
/* These are for internal use */
struct list_head list;
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 2b55222..ecdae39 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static inline void memcg_kmem_set_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
set_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
}
-static bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
return test_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
}
@@ -942,6 +942,20 @@ mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int zid,
return ret;
}
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ val = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid, LRU_ALL_FILE);
+ if (do_swap_account)
+ val += mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+ LRU_ALL_ANON);
+ return val;
+}
+
static unsigned long
mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int nid, unsigned int lru_mask)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 232dfcb..43928fd 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -138,11 +138,42 @@ static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
return !sc->target_mem_cgroup;
}
+
+/*
+ * kmem reclaim should usually not be triggered when we are doing targetted
+ * reclaim. It is only valid when global reclaim is triggered, or when the
+ * underlying memcg has kmem objects.
+ */
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return !sc->target_mem_cgroup ||
+ memcg_kmem_is_active(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ if (global_reclaim(sc))
+ return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+ return memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(sc->target_mem_cgroup, zone);
+}
+
#else
static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
return true;
}
+
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+}
#endif
static unsigned long get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
@@ -221,6 +252,14 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *sc,
long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
: SHRINK_BATCH;
+ /*
+ * If we don't have a target mem cgroup, we scan them all.
+ * Otherwise we will limit our scan to shrinkers marked as
+ * memcg aware
+ */
+ if (sc->target_mem_cgroup && !shrinker->memcg_shrinker)
+ continue;
+
max_pass = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, sc);
WARN_ON(max_pass < 0);
if (max_pass <= 0)
@@ -2163,9 +2202,9 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
/*
* Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
- * over limit cgroups
+ * over limit cgroups, unless we know they have kmem objects
*/
- if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
+ if (has_kmem_reclaim(sc)) {
unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
nodes_clear(shrink->nodes_to_scan);
@@ -2174,7 +2213,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
continue;
- lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+ lru_pages += zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(sc, zone);
node_set(zone_to_nid(zone),
shrink->nodes_to_scan);
}
@@ -2443,6 +2482,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
};
struct shrink_control shrink = {
.gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask,
+ .target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
};
/*
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 14:00 [PATCH v3 00/32] memcg-aware slab shrinking with lasers and numbers Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 01/32] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 02/32] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 03/32] dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 04/32] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 05/32] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 06/32] mm: new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 07/32] shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 08/32] list: add a new LRU list type Glauber Costa
2013-04-15 5:35 ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-15 17:56 ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-16 14:43 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 09/32] inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 10/32] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 11/32] list_lru: per-node " Glauber Costa
2013-04-15 5:37 ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 12/32] shrinker: add node awareness Glauber Costa
2013-04-15 5:38 ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 13/32] fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 14/32] xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code Glauber Costa
2013-04-15 5:38 ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-15 10:14 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 15/32] xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 16/32] fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 17/32] drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 18/32] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to " Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 19/32] hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-04-15 5:38 ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-15 8:10 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 20/32] shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API Glauber Costa
2013-04-15 5:38 ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-08 14:00 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 22/32] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 23/32] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 24/32] list_lru: also include memcg lists in counts and scans Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 25/32] list_lru: per-memcg walks Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 26/32] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 27/32] list_lru: reclaim proportionaly between memcgs and nodes Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 28/32] memcg: scan cache objects hierarchically Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 29/32] memcg: move initialization to memcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 30/32] memcg: shrink dead memcgs upon global memory pressure Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 31/32] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 32/32] memcg: debugging facility to access dangling memcgs Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 20:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/32] memcg-aware slab shrinking with lasers and numbers Andrew Morton
2013-04-09 7:25 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365429659-22108-22-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox