linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Shrinnker <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	hughd@google.com, yinghan@google.com,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 21/28] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:14:03 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364548450-28254-22-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364548450-28254-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>

Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.

Future patches will implement the in-shrinker logic to filter objects
based on its memcg association.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/shrinker.h   |  4 ++++
 mm/memcontrol.c            | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 mm/vmscan.c                | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index d6183f0..4c24249 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head);
 bool mem_cgroup_bad_page_check(struct page *page);
 void mem_cgroup_print_bad_page(struct page *page);
 #endif
+
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone);
 #else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
 struct mem_cgroup;
 
@@ -377,6 +380,12 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_replace_page_cache(struct page *oldpage,
 				struct page *newpage)
 {
 }
+
+static inline unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) || !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)
@@ -429,6 +438,8 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
 	return static_key_false(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
 }
 
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
 /*
  * In general, we'll do everything in our power to not incur in any overhead
  * for non-memcg users for the kmem functions. Not even a function call, if we
@@ -562,6 +573,12 @@ memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
 	return __memcg_kmem_get_cache(cachep, gfp);
 }
 #else
+
+static inline bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx)	\
 	for (; NULL; )
 
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index d4636a0..4e9e53b 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ struct shrink_control {
 
 	/* shrink from these nodes */
 	nodemask_t nodes_to_scan;
+
+	/* reclaim from this memcg only (if not NULL) */
+	struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ struct shrinker {
 
 	int seeks;	/* seeks to recreate an obj */
 	long batch;	/* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
+	bool memcg_shrinker; /* memcg-aware shrinker */
 
 	/* These are for internal use */
 	struct list_head list;
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 2b55222..ecdae39 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static inline void memcg_kmem_set_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 	set_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
 }
 
-static bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	return test_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
 }
@@ -942,6 +942,20 @@ mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int zid,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+	int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+	int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+	unsigned long val;
+
+	val = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid, LRU_ALL_FILE);
+	if (do_swap_account)
+		val += mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+						    LRU_ALL_ANON);
+	return val;
+}
+
 static unsigned long
 mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 			int nid, unsigned int lru_mask)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 232dfcb..43928fd 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -138,11 +138,42 @@ static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	return !sc->target_mem_cgroup;
 }
+
+/*
+ * kmem reclaim should usually not be triggered when we are doing targetted
+ * reclaim. It is only valid when global reclaim is triggered, or when the
+ * underlying memcg has kmem objects.
+ */
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	return !sc->target_mem_cgroup ||
+		memcg_kmem_is_active(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+	if (global_reclaim(sc))
+		return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+	return memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(sc->target_mem_cgroup, zone);
+}
+
 #else
 static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	return true;
 }
+
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+	return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+}
 #endif
 
 static unsigned long get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
@@ -221,6 +252,14 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *sc,
 		long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
 						  : SHRINK_BATCH;
 
+		/*
+		 * If we don't have a target mem cgroup, we scan them all.
+		 * Otherwise we will limit our scan to shrinkers marked as
+		 * memcg aware
+		 */
+		if (sc->target_mem_cgroup && !shrinker->memcg_shrinker)
+			continue;
+
 		max_pass = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, sc);
 		WARN_ON(max_pass < 0);
 		if (max_pass <= 0)
@@ -2163,9 +2202,9 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 
 		/*
 		 * Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
-		 * over limit cgroups
+		 * over limit cgroups, unless we know they have kmem objects
 		 */
-		if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
+		if (has_kmem_reclaim(sc)) {
 			unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
 
 			nodes_clear(shrink->nodes_to_scan);
@@ -2174,7 +2213,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 				if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
 					continue;
 
-				lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+				lru_pages += zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(sc, zone);
 				node_set(zone_to_nid(zone),
 					 shrink->nodes_to_scan);
 			}
@@ -2443,6 +2482,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 	};
 	struct shrink_control shrink = {
 		.gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask,
+		.target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
 	};
 
 	/*
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-29  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-29  9:13 [PATCH v2 00/28] memcg-aware slab shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2013-04-01  7:16   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-04-01  7:26   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01  8:10     ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-10  5:09       ` Ric Mason
2013-04-10  7:32         ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-10  9:19         ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-08  8:42   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-08  8:47     ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-08  9:01       ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-08  9:05         ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-09  0:55           ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09  1:29             ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-09  2:05               ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09  7:43                 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-09  9:08                   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09 12:30                 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10  2:51                   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-10  7:30                     ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-10  8:19                       ` Joonsoo Kim
     [not found]                     ` <20130410025115.GA5872-Hm3cg6mZ9cc@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-10  8:46                       ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-10  8:46                     ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-10 10:07                       ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 14:03                         ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-04-11  0:41                           ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-11  7:27                             ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-11  7:27                             ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-11  7:27                             ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-11  9:25                               ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10  8:46                     ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Glauber Costa
2013-04-05  1:09   ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-05  1:15     ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-08  9:14       ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 13:18         ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 23:26         ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-09  8:02           ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-09 12:47             ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list Glauber Costa
2013-04-03  6:51   ` Sha Zhengju
2013-04-03  8:55     ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-04  6:19     ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-04  6:56       ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] mm: new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-04-05  1:09   ` Greg Thelen
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] list: add a new LRU list type Glauber Costa
2013-04-04 21:53   ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-05  1:20     ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-05  8:01       ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-06  0:04         ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 13:14   ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 23:28     ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] list_lru: per-node " Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] shrinker: add node awareness Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to " Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-04-01  7:46   ` [PATCH v2 21/28] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01  8:51     ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-03 10:11   ` Sha Zhengju
2013-04-03 10:43     ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-04  9:35       ` Sha Zhengju
2013-04-05  8:25         ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-04-01  8:05   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01  8:22     ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-04-01  8:18   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01  8:29     ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] list_lru: also include memcg lists in counts and scans Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] list_lru: per-memcg walks Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-04-01  8:31   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01  8:48     ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-01  9:01       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01  9:14         ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-01  9:35         ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] list_lru: reclaim proportionaly between memcgs and nodes Glauber Costa
2013-03-29  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 00/28] memcg-aware slab shrinking Serge Hallyn
2013-04-01 12:45   ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 14:12     ` Serge Hallyn
2013-04-08  8:11       ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-02  4:58   ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-02  7:55     ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1364548450-28254-22-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox