From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Shrinnker <david@fromorbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
hughd@google.com, yinghan@google.com,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/28] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:13:52 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364548450-28254-11-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364548450-28254-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/dcache.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
fs/super.c | 11 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 15 +++--
3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 2c9fcd6..b59d341 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
#include <linux/rculist_bl.h>
#include <linux/prefetch.h>
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
+#include <linux/list_lru.h>
#include "internal.h"
#include "mount.h"
@@ -318,20 +319,8 @@ static void dentry_unlink_inode(struct dentry * dentry)
*/
static void dentry_lru_add(struct dentry *dentry)
{
- if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru);
- dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused++;
+ if (list_lru_add(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru, &dentry->d_lru))
this_cpu_inc(nr_dentry_unused);
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- }
-}
-
-static void __dentry_lru_del(struct dentry *dentry)
-{
- list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
- dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
- this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
}
/*
@@ -341,11 +330,8 @@ static void dentry_lru_del(struct dentry *dentry)
{
BUG_ON(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST);
- if (!list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- __dentry_lru_del(dentry);
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- }
+ if (list_lru_del(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru, &dentry->d_lru))
+ this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
}
/*
@@ -361,35 +347,19 @@ static void dentry_lru_del(struct dentry *dentry)
*/
static void dentry_lru_prune(struct dentry *dentry)
{
- if (!list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
+ int prune = dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_PRUNE;
- if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_PRUNE)
- dentry->d_op->d_prune(dentry);
-
- if ((dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST))
- list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
- else {
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- __dentry_lru_del(dentry);
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- }
- dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST;
- }
-}
-
-static void dentry_lru_move_list(struct dentry *dentry, struct list_head *list)
-{
- BUG_ON(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST);
-
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
- list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, list);
- } else {
- list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, list);
- dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
+ if (!list_empty(&dentry->d_lru) &&
+ (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST))
+ list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
+ else if (list_lru_del(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru, &dentry->d_lru))
this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
- }
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
+ else
+ prune = 0;
+
+ dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST;
+ if (prune)
+ dentry->d_op->d_prune(dentry);
}
/**
@@ -854,6 +824,51 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
rcu_read_unlock();
}
+static int dentry_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item, spinlock_t *lru_lock,
+ void *arg)
+{
+ struct list_head *freeable = arg;
+ struct dentry *dentry = container_of(item, struct dentry, d_lru);
+
+
+ /*
+ * we are inverting the lru lock/dentry->d_lock here,
+ * so use a trylock. If we fail to get the lock, just skip
+ * it
+ */
+ if (!spin_trylock(&dentry->d_lock))
+ return 2;
+
+ /*
+ * Referenced dentries are still in use. If they have active
+ * counts, just remove them from the LRU. Otherwise give them
+ * another pass through the LRU.
+ */
+ if (dentry->d_count) {
+ list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
+ dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * XXX: this list move should be be done under d_lock. Need to
+ * determine if it is safe just to do it under the lru lock.
+ */
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST;
+ list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, freeable);
+ this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* prune_dcache_sb - shrink the dcache
* @sb: superblock
@@ -868,45 +883,12 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
*/
long prune_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb, long nr_to_scan)
{
- struct dentry *dentry;
- LIST_HEAD(referenced);
- LIST_HEAD(tmp);
- long freed = 0;
-
-relock:
- spin_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- while (!list_empty(&sb->s_dentry_lru)) {
- dentry = list_entry(sb->s_dentry_lru.prev,
- struct dentry, d_lru);
- BUG_ON(dentry->d_sb != sb);
-
- if (!spin_trylock(&dentry->d_lock)) {
- spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- cpu_relax();
- goto relock;
- }
-
- if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
- dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
- list_move(&dentry->d_lru, &referenced);
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- } else {
- list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &tmp);
- dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST;
- this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
- sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- freed++;
- if (!--nr_to_scan)
- break;
- }
- cond_resched_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- }
- if (!list_empty(&referenced))
- list_splice(&referenced, &sb->s_dentry_lru);
- spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
+ LIST_HEAD(dispose);
+ long freed;
- shrink_dentry_list(&tmp);
+ freed = list_lru_walk(&sb->s_dentry_lru, dentry_lru_isolate,
+ &dispose, nr_to_scan);
+ shrink_dentry_list(&dispose);
return freed;
}
@@ -941,24 +923,10 @@ shrink_dcache_list(
*/
void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
{
- LIST_HEAD(tmp);
-
- spin_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- while (!list_empty(&sb->s_dentry_lru)) {
- list_splice_init(&sb->s_dentry_lru, &tmp);
-
- /*
- * account for removal here so we don't need to handle it later
- * even though the dentry is no longer on the lru list.
- */
- this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, sb->s_nr_dentry_unused);
- sb->s_nr_dentry_unused = 0;
+ long freed;
- spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- shrink_dcache_list(&tmp);
- spin_lock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
- }
- spin_unlock(&sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
+ freed = list_lru_dispose_all(&sb->s_dentry_lru, shrink_dcache_list);
+ this_cpu_sub(nr_dentry_unused, freed);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(shrink_dcache_sb);
@@ -1229,7 +1197,8 @@ resume:
if (dentry->d_count) {
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
} else if (!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST)) {
- dentry_lru_move_list(dentry, dispose);
+ dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, dispose);
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST;
found++;
}
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 9049110..66f5cde 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -78,11 +78,11 @@ static long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb);
inodes = list_lru_count(&sb->s_inode_lru);
- total_objects = sb->s_nr_dentry_unused + inodes + fs_objects + 1;
+ dentries = list_lru_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru);
+ total_objects = dentries + inodes + fs_objects + 1;
/* proportion the scan between the caches */
- dentries = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, sb->s_nr_dentry_unused,
- total_objects);
+ dentries = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, dentries, total_objects);
inodes = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, inodes, total_objects);
/*
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc
if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
total_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb);
- total_objects += sb->s_nr_dentry_unused;
+ total_objects += list_lru_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru);
total_objects += list_lru_count(&sb->s_inode_lru);
total_objects = vfs_pressure_ratio(total_objects);
@@ -195,8 +195,7 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags)
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&s->s_instances);
INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD(&s->s_anon);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_inodes);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_dentry_lru);
- spin_lock_init(&s->s_dentry_lru_lock);
+ list_lru_init(&s->s_dentry_lru);
list_lru_init(&s->s_inode_lru);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_mounts);
init_rwsem(&s->s_umount);
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index fdeaca1..8b25de0 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1262,14 +1262,6 @@ struct super_block {
struct list_head s_files;
#endif
struct list_head s_mounts; /* list of mounts; _not_ for fs use */
-
- /* s_dentry_lru_lock protects s_dentry_lru and s_nr_dentry_unused */
- spinlock_t s_dentry_lru_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
- struct list_head s_dentry_lru; /* unused dentry lru */
- int s_nr_dentry_unused; /* # of dentry on lru */
-
- struct list_lru s_inode_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-
struct block_device *s_bdev;
struct backing_dev_info *s_bdi;
struct mtd_info *s_mtd;
@@ -1320,6 +1312,13 @@ struct super_block {
/* Being remounted read-only */
int s_readonly_remount;
+
+ /*
+ * Keep the lru lists last in the structure so they always sit on their
+ * own individual cachelines.
+ */
+ struct list_lru s_dentry_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+ struct list_lru s_inode_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
};
extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb);
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-29 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-29 9:13 [PATCH v2 00/28] memcg-aware slab shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 7:16 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 7:26 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01 8:10 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-10 5:09 ` Ric Mason
2013-04-10 7:32 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-10 9:19 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-08 8:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-08 8:47 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 9:01 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-08 9:05 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-09 0:55 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09 1:29 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-09 2:05 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09 7:43 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-09 9:08 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09 12:30 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 2:51 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-10 7:30 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-10 8:19 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-10 8:46 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-10 10:07 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 14:03 ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-04-11 0:41 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-11 7:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-11 9:25 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-11 7:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-11 7:27 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <20130410025115.GA5872-Hm3cg6mZ9cc@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-10 8:46 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-10 8:46 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Glauber Costa
2013-04-05 1:09 ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-05 1:15 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-08 9:14 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 13:18 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 23:26 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-09 8:02 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-09 12:47 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list Glauber Costa
2013-04-03 6:51 ` Sha Zhengju
2013-04-03 8:55 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-04 6:19 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-04 6:56 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] mm: new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-04-05 1:09 ` Greg Thelen
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] list: add a new LRU list type Glauber Costa
2013-04-04 21:53 ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-05 1:20 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 8:01 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-06 0:04 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-04-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure Glauber Costa
2013-04-08 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] list_lru: per-node " Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] shrinker: add node awareness Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to " Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 7:46 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01 8:51 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-03 10:11 ` Sha Zhengju
2013-04-03 10:43 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-04 9:35 ` Sha Zhengju
2013-04-05 8:25 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 8:05 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01 8:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 8:18 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01 8:29 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] list_lru: also include memcg lists in counts and scans Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] list_lru: per-memcg walks Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 8:31 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01 8:48 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 9:01 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-01 9:14 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 9:35 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] list_lru: reclaim proportionaly between memcgs and nodes Glauber Costa
2013-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 00/28] memcg-aware slab shrinking Serge Hallyn
2013-04-01 12:45 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-01 14:12 ` Serge Hallyn
2013-04-08 8:11 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-02 4:58 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-02 7:55 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364548450-28254-11-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox