From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] memcg: increment static branch right after limit set.
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:47:40 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358862461-18046-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358862461-18046-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
We were deferring the kmemcg static branch increment to a later time,
due to a nasty dependency between the cpu_hotplug lock, taken by the
jump label update, and the cgroup_lock.
Now we no longer take the cgroup lock, and we can save ourselves the
trouble.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 31 +++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f5decb7..357324c 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4926,8 +4926,6 @@ static int memcg_update_kmem_limit(struct cgroup *cont, u64 val)
{
int ret = -EINVAL;
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
- bool must_inc_static_branch = false;
-
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
/*
* For simplicity, we won't allow this to be disabled. It also can't
@@ -4956,7 +4954,13 @@ static int memcg_update_kmem_limit(struct cgroup *cont, u64 val)
res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->kmem, RESOURCE_MAX);
goto out;
}
- must_inc_static_branch = true;
+ static_key_slow_inc(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
+ /*
+ * setting the active bit after the inc will guarantee no one
+ * starts accounting before all call sites are patched
+ */
+ memcg_kmem_set_active(memcg);
+
/*
* kmem charges can outlive the cgroup. In the case of slab
* pages, for instance, a page contain objects from various
@@ -4969,27 +4973,6 @@ static int memcg_update_kmem_limit(struct cgroup *cont, u64 val)
out:
mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&memcg_create_mutex);
-
- /*
- * We are by now familiar with the fact that we can't inc the static
- * branch inside cgroup_lock. See disarm functions for details. A
- * worker here is overkill, but also wrong: After the limit is set, we
- * must start accounting right away. Since this operation can't fail,
- * we can safely defer it to here - no rollback will be needed.
- *
- * The boolean used to control this is also safe, because
- * KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVATED guarantees that only one process will be
- * able to set it to true;
- */
- if (must_inc_static_branch) {
- static_key_slow_inc(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
- /*
- * setting the active bit after the inc will guarantee no one
- * starts accounting before all call sites are patched
- */
- memcg_kmem_set_active(memcg);
- }
-
#endif
return ret;
}
--
1.8.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 13:47 [PATCH v4 0/6] replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific locking Glauber Costa
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] memcg: prevent changes to move_charge_at_immigrate during task attach Glauber Costa
2013-01-29 0:11 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] memcg: split part of memcg creation to css_online Glauber Costa
2013-01-25 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-28 8:35 ` Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-29 0:12 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] memcg: fast hierarchy-aware child test Glauber Costa
2013-01-25 23:59 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-28 8:30 ` Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-29 0:14 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] memcg: replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific memcg_lock Glauber Costa
2013-01-22 14:00 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-29 0:16 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-01-29 0:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] memcg: increment static branch right after limit set Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-22 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] memcg: avoid dangling reference count in creation failure Glauber Costa
2013-01-22 14:00 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-29 0:22 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-01-25 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific locking Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-25 10:18 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-25 10:27 ` Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand
2013-01-25 17:37 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-26 0:03 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358862461-18046-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox