From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx148.postini.com [74.125.245.148]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65A5E6B0004 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 06:43:58 -0500 (EST) From: Tang Chen Subject: [PATCH Bug fix 2/5] Bug-fix: mempolicy: fix is_valid_nodemask() Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:43:01 +0800 Message-Id: <1358854984-6073-3-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1358854984-6073-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1358854984-6073-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com, len.brown@intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, cl@linux.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, wujianguo@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, hpa@zytor.com, linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, glommer@parallels.com, jiang.liu@huawei.com, julian.calaby@gmail.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org From: Lai Jiangshan is_valid_nodemask() is introduced by 19770b32. but it does not match its comments, because it does not check the zone which > policy_zone. Also in b377fd, this commits told us, if highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE, we should also apply memory policies to it. so ZONE_MOVABLE should be valid zone for policies. is_valid_nodemask() need to be changed to match it. Fix: check all zones, even its zoneid > policy_zone. Use nodes_intersects() instead open code to check it. Reported-by: Wen Congyang Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Tang Chen --- mm/mempolicy.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index af8a121..6f7979c 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -161,19 +161,7 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations { /* Check that the nodemask contains at least one populated zone */ static int is_valid_nodemask(const nodemask_t *nodemask) { - int nd, k; - - for_each_node_mask(nd, *nodemask) { - struct zone *z; - - for (k = 0; k <= policy_zone; k++) { - z = &NODE_DATA(nd)->node_zones[k]; - if (z->managed_pages > 0) - return 1; - } - } - - return 0; + return nodes_intersects(*nodemask, node_states[N_MEMORY]); } static inline int mpol_store_user_nodemask(const struct mempolicy *pol) @@ -1644,6 +1632,26 @@ struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task, return pol; } +static int apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone) +{ + enum zone_type dynamic_policy_zone = policy_zone; + + BUG_ON(dynamic_policy_zone == ZONE_MOVABLE); + + /* + * if policy->v.nodes has movable memory only, + * we apply policy when gfp_zone(gfp) = ZONE_MOVABLE only. + * + * policy->v.nodes is intersect with node_states[N_MEMORY]. + * so if the following test faile, it implies + * policy->v.nodes has movable memory only. + */ + if (!nodes_intersects(policy->v.nodes, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY])) + dynamic_policy_zone = ZONE_MOVABLE; + + return zone >= dynamic_policy_zone; +} + /* * Return a nodemask representing a mempolicy for filtering nodes for * page allocation @@ -1652,7 +1660,7 @@ static nodemask_t *policy_nodemask(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy) { /* Lower zones don't get a nodemask applied for MPOL_BIND */ if (unlikely(policy->mode == MPOL_BIND) && - gfp_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone && + apply_policy_zone(policy, gfp_zone(gfp)) && cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed(&policy->v.nodes)) return &policy->v.nodes; -- 1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org