linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	js1304@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] slub: correct to calculate num of acquired objects in get_partial_node()
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:01:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358755287-3899-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> (raw)

There is a subtle bug when calculating a number of acquired objects.

Currently, we calculate "available = page->objects - page->inuse",
after acquire_slab() is called in get_partial_node().

In acquire_slab() with mode = 1, we always set new.inuse = page->objects.
So,

	acquire_slab(s, n, page, object == NULL);

	if (!object) {
		c->page = page;
		stat(s, ALLOC_FROM_PARTIAL);
		object = t;
		available = page->objects - page->inuse;

		!!! availabe is always 0 !!!
	...

Therfore, "available > s->cpu_partial / 2" is always false and
we always go to second iteration.
This patch correct this problem.

After that, we don't need return value of put_cpu_partial().
So remove it.

v2: calculate nr of objects using new.objects and new.inuse.
It is more accurate way than before.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index ba2ca53..7204c74 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static inline void remove_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
  */
 static inline void *acquire_slab(struct kmem_cache *s,
 		struct kmem_cache_node *n, struct page *page,
-		int mode)
+		int mode, int *objects)
 {
 	void *freelist;
 	unsigned long counters;
@@ -1507,6 +1507,7 @@ static inline void *acquire_slab(struct kmem_cache *s,
 	freelist = page->freelist;
 	counters = page->counters;
 	new.counters = counters;
+	*objects = new.objects - new.inuse;
 	if (mode) {
 		new.inuse = page->objects;
 		new.freelist = NULL;
@@ -1528,7 +1529,7 @@ static inline void *acquire_slab(struct kmem_cache *s,
 	return freelist;
 }
 
-static int put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain);
+static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain);
 static inline bool pfmemalloc_match(struct page *page, gfp_t gfpflags);
 
 /*
@@ -1539,6 +1540,8 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
 {
 	struct page *page, *page2;
 	void *object = NULL;
+	int available = 0;
+	int objects;
 
 	/*
 	 * Racy check. If we mistakenly see no partial slabs then we
@@ -1552,22 +1555,21 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
 	spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, page2, &n->partial, lru) {
 		void *t;
-		int available;
 
 		if (!pfmemalloc_match(page, flags))
 			continue;
 
-		t = acquire_slab(s, n, page, object == NULL);
+		t = acquire_slab(s, n, page, object == NULL, &objects);
 		if (!t)
 			break;
 
+		available += objects;
 		if (!object) {
 			c->page = page;
 			stat(s, ALLOC_FROM_PARTIAL);
 			object = t;
-			available =  page->objects - page->inuse;
 		} else {
-			available = put_cpu_partial(s, page, 0);
+			put_cpu_partial(s, page, 0);
 			stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_NODE);
 		}
 		if (kmem_cache_debug(s) || available > s->cpu_partial / 2)
@@ -1946,7 +1948,7 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s,
  * If we did not find a slot then simply move all the partials to the
  * per node partial list.
  */
-static int put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
+static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
 {
 	struct page *oldpage;
 	int pages;
@@ -1984,7 +1986,6 @@ static int put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
 		page->next = oldpage;
 
 	} while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page) != oldpage);
-	return pobjects;
 }
 
 static inline void flush_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2013-01-21  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-21  8:01 Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-01-21  8:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] slub: correct bootstrap() for kmem_cache, kmem_cache_node Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23 15:25   ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-21  8:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] slub: add 'likely' macro to inc_slabs_node() Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23  5:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] slub: correct to calculate num of acquired objects in get_partial_node() Wanpeng Li
2013-01-23  5:15 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-01-23 15:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-19  5:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-02  6:43   ` Pekka Enberg
2013-04-02 19:17     ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1358755287-3899-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox