From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [memcg:since-3.6 493/499] include/trace/events/filemap.h:14:1: sparse: incompatible types for operation (<)
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:00:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354932053.17101.113.camel@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ehj81pxx.fsf@free.fr>
On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 15:36 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> writes:
>
> > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git since-3.6
> > head: 422a0f651b5cefa1b6b3ede2e1c9e540a24a6e01
> > commit: 07b81da5f80b27543ddbe3164170c64e0941a812 [493/499] mm: trace filemap add and del
> >
> >
> > sparse warnings:
> >
> > + include/trace/events/filemap.h:14:1: sparse: incompatible types for operation (<)
> > include/trace/events/filemap.h:14:1: left side has type struct page *<noident>
> > include/trace/events/filemap.h:14:1: right side has type int
> > include/trace/events/filemap.h:45:1: sparse: incompatible types for operation (<)
> > include/trace/events/filemap.h:45:1: left side has type struct page *<noident>
> > include/trace/events/filemap.h:45:1: right side has type int
>
> Hi Steven, Frederic and Ingo,
Sorry for the late reply, It's end of year and I'm getting a lot of
pressure at work to get things done.
>
> I just drop this note to make you aware (as FTRACE maintainers) of the sparse
> warning I received.
>
> This sparse warning will touch all submission to the FTRACE events API AFAIK.
> The node of the problem :
> - in include/linux/ftrace_event.h, we have :
> #define is_signed_type(type) (((type)(-1)) < 0)
> - this is used by kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> #define __common_field(type, item)
> ...
> is_signed_type(type)
> ...
>
> Here, if a trace field is a pointer (for example struct page *), we end up with
> this in my case :
>
> static int __attribute__((no_instrument_function))
> ftrace_define_fields_mm_filemap_delete_from_page_cache(struct ftrace_event_call
> *event_call) { struct ftrace_raw_mm_filemap_delete_from_page_cache field; int
> ret; ret = trace_define_field(event_call, "struct page *", "page",
> __builtin_offsetof(typeof(field),page), sizeof(field.page), (((struct page
> *)(-1)) < 0), FILTER_OTHER); if (ret) return ret; ret =
> trace_define_field(event_call, "unsigned long", "i_ino",
> __builtin_offsetof(typeof(field),i_ino), sizeof(field.i_ino), (((unsigned
> long)(-1)) < 0), FILTER_OTHER); if (ret) return ret; ret =
> trace_define_field(event_call, "unsigned long", "index",
> __builtin_offsetof(typeof(field),index), sizeof(field.index), (((unsigned
> long)(-1)) < 0), FILTER_OTHER); if (ret) return ret; ret =
> trace_define_field(event_call, "dev_t", "s_dev",
> __builtin_offsetof(typeof(field),s_dev), sizeof(field.s_dev), (((dev_t)(-1)) <
> 0), FILTER_OTHER); if (ret) return ret;; return ret; }; ;;
>
> And I think, (((struct page *)(-1)) < 0) gives the warning. I don't know if
> "is_signed_type()" makes sense on a pointer, but I think you'll get other
> reports of that kind for any new event added to trace API.
Hmm, this is mostly automated via the macros. Not sure how we can
differentiate a pointer from other fields. Would this be fixed if we
did:
#define is_signed_type(type) (((type)(-1) < (type)0)
?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-08 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-29 23:46 kbuild test robot
2012-12-02 14:36 ` Robert Jarzmik
2012-12-08 2:00 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-12-08 18:47 ` Robert Jarzmik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354932053.17101.113.camel@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox