From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
wency@cn.fujitsu.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:45:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353105943.12509.60.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446291.TgLDtXqY7q@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 22:43 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:22:47 AM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> > As discussed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1581581/
> > the driver core remove function needs to always succeed. This means we need
> > to know that the device can be successfully removed before acpi_bus_trim /
> > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device are called. This can cause panics when OSPM-initiated
> > eject or driver unbind of memory devices fails e.g with:
> >
> > echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> > echo "PNP0C80:XX" > /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind
> >
> > since the ACPI core goes ahead and ejects the device regardless of whether the
> > the memory is still in use or not.
>
> So the question is, does the ACPI core have to do that and if so, then why?
The problem is that acpi_memory_devcie_remove() can fail. However,
device_release_driver() is a void function, so it cannot report its
error. Here are function flows for SCI, sysfs eject and unbind.
SCI & sysfs eject
===
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
acpi_bus_trim()
acpi_bus_remove()
device_release_driver() // Driver Core
acpi_device_remove()
acpi_memory_device_remove() // ACPI Driver
acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_EJ0",,) // Eject
sysfs unbind
===
driver_unbind() // Driver Core
device_release_driver() // Driver Core
acpi_device_remove()
acpi_memory_device_remove() // ACPI Driver
put_device()
bus_put()
Yasuaki's approach was to change device_release_driver() to report an
error so that acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() can fail without ejecting.
Vasilis's approach was to call ACPI driver via a new interface before
device_release_driver(), but still requires to change driver_unbind().
It looks to me that some changes to driver core is needed...
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-16 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 10:22 Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-16 21:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 22:45 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2012-11-16 23:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:14 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:35 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17 0:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17 0:08 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17 0:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17 0:25 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-18 16:16 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353105943.12509.60.camel@misato.fc.hp.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox