From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
rjw@sisk.pl, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [Patch v4 5/8] suppress "Device nodeX does not have a release() function" warning
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:23:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1351682594-17347-6-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351682594-17347-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
When calling unregister_node(), the function shows following message at
device_release().
"Device 'node2' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must
be fixed."
The reason is node's device struct does not have a release() function.
So the patch registers node_device_release() to the device's release()
function for suppressing the warning message. Additionally, the patch adds
memset() to initialize a node struct into register_node(). Because the node
struct is part of node_devices[] array and it cannot be freed by
node_device_release(). So if system reuses the node struct, it has a garbage.
CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/base/node.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
index 28216ce..4282e82 100644
--- a/drivers/base/node.c
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -252,6 +252,24 @@ static inline void hugetlb_register_node(struct node *node) {}
static inline void hugetlb_unregister_node(struct node *node) {}
#endif
+static void node_device_release(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct node *node = to_node(dev);
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE) && defined(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS)
+ /*
+ * We schedule the work only when a memory section is
+ * onlined/offlined on this node. When we come here,
+ * all the memory on this node has been offlined,
+ * so we won't enqueue new work to this work.
+ *
+ * The work is using node->node_work, so we should
+ * flush work before freeing the memory.
+ */
+ flush_work(&node->node_work);
+#endif
+ kfree(node);
+}
/*
* register_node - Setup a sysfs device for a node.
@@ -265,6 +283,7 @@ int register_node(struct node *node, int num, struct node *parent)
node->dev.id = num;
node->dev.bus = &node_subsys;
+ node->dev.release = node_device_release;
error = device_register(&node->dev);
if (!error){
@@ -586,7 +605,6 @@ int register_one_node(int nid)
void unregister_one_node(int nid)
{
unregister_node(node_devices[nid]);
- kfree(node_devices[nid]);
node_devices[nid] = NULL;
}
--
1.8.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-31 11:23 [Patch v4 0/8] bugfix for memory hotplug Wen Congyang
2012-10-31 11:23 ` [Patch v4 1/8] memory hotplug: suppress "Device memoryX does not have a release() function" warning Wen Congyang
2012-10-31 11:23 ` [Patch v4 2/8] memory-hotplug: auto offline page_cgroup when onlining memory block failed Wen Congyang
2012-10-31 11:23 ` [Patch v4 3/8] memory-hotplug: fix NR_FREE_PAGES mismatch Wen Congyang
2012-10-31 13:41 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-01 3:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 2:55 ` [PATCH] memory-hotplug: fix NR_FREE_PAGES mismatch's fix Wen Congyang
2012-10-31 11:23 ` [Patch v4 4/8] numa: convert static memory to dynamically allocated memory for per node device Wen Congyang
2012-10-31 11:23 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-10-31 11:23 ` [Patch v4 6/8] clear the memory to store struct page Wen Congyang
2012-10-31 11:23 ` [Patch v4 7/8] memory-hotplug: current hwpoison doesn't support memory offline Wen Congyang
2012-10-31 11:23 ` [Patch v4 8/8] memory-hotplug: allocate zone's pcp before onlining pages Wen Congyang
2012-10-31 11:32 ` [Patch v4 0/8] bugfix for memory hotplug Wen Congyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1351682594-17347-6-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox