From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Qiang Gao <gaoqiangscut@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: process hangs on do_exit when oom happens
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:04:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1351281877.16639.98.camel@maggy.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351270990.16639.92.camel@maggy.simpson.net>
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 10:03 -0700, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> The bug is in the patch that used sched_setscheduler_nocheck(). Plain
> sched_setscheduler() would have replied -EGOAWAY.
sched_setscheduler_nocheck() should say go away too methinks. This
isn't about permissions, it's about not being stupid in general.
sched: fix __sched_setscheduler() RT_GROUP_SCHED conditionals
Remove user and rt_bandwidth_enabled() RT_GROUP_SCHED conditionals in
__sched_setscheduler(). The end result of kernel OR user promoting a
task in a group with zero rt_runtime allocated is the same bad thing,
and throttle switch position matters little. It's safer to just say
no solely based upon bandwidth existence, may save the user a nasty
surprise if he later flips the throttle switch to 'on'.
The commit below came about due to sched_setscheduler_nocheck()
allowing a task in a task group with zero rt_runtime allocated to
be promoted by the kernel oom logic, thus marooning it forever.
<quote>
commit 341aea2bc48bf652777fb015cc2b3dfa9a451817
Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu Apr 14 15:22:13 2011 -0700
oom-kill: remove boost_dying_task_prio()
This is an almost-revert of commit 93b43fa ("oom: give the dying task a
higher priority").
That commit dramatically improved oom killer logic when a fork-bomb
occurs. But I've found that it has nasty corner case. Now cpu cgroup has
strange default RT runtime. It's 0! That said, if a process under cpu
cgroup promote RT scheduling class, the process never run at all.
</quote>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2d8927f..d3a35f8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3810,17 +3810,14 @@ recheck:
}
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
- if (user) {
- /*
- * Do not allow realtime tasks into groups that have no runtime
- * assigned.
- */
- if (rt_bandwidth_enabled() && rt_policy(policy) &&
- task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0 &&
- !task_group_is_autogroup(task_group(p))) {
- task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
- return -EPERM;
- }
+ /*
+ * Do not allow realtime tasks into groups that have no runtime
+ * assigned.
+ */
+ if (rt_policy(policy) && task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0 &&
+ !task_group_is_autogroup(task_group(p))) {
+ task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
+ return -EPERM;
}
#endif
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-26 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <op.wmbi5kbrn27o5l@gaoqiang-d1.corp.qihoo.net>
2012-10-19 16:04 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-22 2:16 ` Qiang Gao
2012-10-22 5:38 ` Balbir Singh
2012-10-22 13:01 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-22 4:26 ` Qiang Gao
2012-10-23 3:35 ` Qiang Gao
2012-10-23 4:40 ` Balbir Singh
2012-10-23 7:18 ` Qiang Gao
2012-10-23 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-23 10:10 ` Qiang Gao
2012-10-23 10:15 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-23 17:43 ` Balbir Singh
2012-10-24 3:44 ` Qiang Gao
2012-10-25 9:57 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-26 2:42 ` Qiang Gao
2012-10-26 17:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-10-26 20:04 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2012-10-23 8:35 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-23 9:08 ` Qiang Gao
2012-10-23 9:43 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-23 9:01 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-10-23 9:10 ` Qiang Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1351281877.16639.98.camel@maggy.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gaoqiangscut@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox