From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: Fix XFS oops due to dirty pages without buffers on s390
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:26:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349108796-32161-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
On s390 any write to a page (even from kernel itself) sets architecture
specific page dirty bit. Thus when a page is written to via standard write, HW
dirty bit gets set and when we later map and unmap the page, page_remove_rmap()
finds the dirty bit and calls set_page_dirty().
Dirtying of a page which shouldn't be dirty can cause all sorts of problems to
filesystems. The bug we observed in practice is that buffers from the page get
freed, so when the page gets later marked as dirty and writeback writes it, XFS
crashes due to an assertion BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page)) in page_buffers() called
from xfs_count_page_state().
Similar problem can also happen when zero_user_segment() call from
xfs_vm_writepage() (or block_write_full_page() for that matter) set the
hardware dirty bit during writeback, later buffers get freed, and then page
unmapped.
Fix the issue by ignoring s390 HW dirty bit for page cache pages in
page_mkclean() and page_remove_rmap(). This is safe because when a page gets
marked as writeable in PTE it is also marked dirty in do_wp_page() or
do_page_fault(). When the dirty bit is cleared by clear_page_dirty_for_io(),
the page gets writeprotected in page_mkclean(). So pagecache page is writeable
if and only if it is dirty.
CC: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
CC: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
mm/rmap.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 0f3b7cd..6ce8ddb 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -973,7 +973,15 @@ int page_mkclean(struct page *page)
struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
if (mapping) {
ret = page_mkclean_file(mapping, page);
- if (page_test_and_clear_dirty(page_to_pfn(page), 1))
+ /*
+ * We ignore dirty bit for pagecache pages. It is safe
+ * as page is marked dirty iff it is writeable (page is
+ * marked as dirty when it is made writeable and
+ * clear_page_dirty_for_io() writeprotects the page
+ * again).
+ */
+ if (PageSwapCache(page) &&
+ page_test_and_clear_dirty(page_to_pfn(page), 1))
ret = 1;
}
}
@@ -1183,8 +1191,12 @@ void page_remove_rmap(struct page *page)
* this if the page is anon, so about to be freed; but perhaps
* not if it's in swapcache - there might be another pte slot
* containing the swap entry, but page not yet written to swap.
+ * For pagecache pages, we don't care about dirty bit in storage
+ * key because the page is writeable iff it is dirty (page is marked
+ * as dirty when it is made writeable and clear_page_dirty_for_io()
+ * writeprotects the page again).
*/
- if ((!anon || PageSwapCache(page)) &&
+ if (PageSwapCache(page) &&
page_test_and_clear_dirty(page_to_pfn(page), 1))
set_page_dirty(page);
/*
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-01 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-01 16:26 Jan Kara [this message]
2012-10-08 14:28 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-09 4:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-09 8:18 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-09 23:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-10 21:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-19 14:38 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-09 9:32 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-09 23:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-09 16:21 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-10 2:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-10 8:55 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-10 21:28 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-11 7:42 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-10 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 7:44 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-17 0:43 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-22 15:06 Jan Kara
2012-10-22 19:38 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-23 4:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-23 10:21 ` Jan Kara
2012-10-23 21:56 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-24 8:30 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-10-25 20:01 ` Jan Kara
2012-12-14 8:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-12-17 23:31 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-12-18 7:30 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349108796-32161-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox