From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] mm: Batch unmapping of file mapped pages in shrink_page_list
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:06:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347552370.9977.99.camel@schen9-DESK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120911110535.GO11157@csn.ul.ie>
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:05 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> One *massive* change here that is not called out in the changelog is that
> the reclaim path now holds the page lock on multiple pages at the same
> time waiting for them to be batch unlocked in __remove_mapping_batch.
> This is suspicious for two reasons.
>
> The first suspicion is that it is expected that there are filesystems
> that lock multiple pages in page->index order and page reclaim tries to
> lock pages in a random order. You are "ok" because you trylock the pages
> but there should be a comment explaining the situation and why you're
> ok.
>
> My *far* greater concern is that the hold time for a locked page is
> now potentially much longer. You could lock a bunch of filesystem pages
> and then call pageout() on an swapcache page that takes a long time to
> write. This potentially causes a filesystem (or flusher threads etc)
> to stall on lock_page and that could cause all sorts of latency trouble.
> It will be hard to hit this bug and diagnose it but I believe it's
> there.
>
> That second risk *really* must be commented upon and ideally reviewed by
> the filesystem people. However, I very strongly suspect that the outcome
> of such a review will be a suggestion to unlock the pages and reacquire
> the lock in __remove_mapping_batch(). Bear in mind that if you take this
> approach that you *must* use trylock when reacquiring the page lock and
> handle being unable to lock the page.
>
Mel,
Thanks for your detailed comments and analysis. If I unlock the pages,
will flusher threads be the only things that will touch them? Or do I
have to worry about potentially other things done to the pages that will
make it invalid for me to unmap the pages later and put them on free
list?
Tim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-13 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 16:19 Tim Chen
2012-09-11 2:36 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-11 11:05 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-13 16:06 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2012-09-14 8:56 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-12 19:28 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1347552370.9977.99.camel@schen9-DESK \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox