From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx133.postini.com [74.125.245.133]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB2A36B00ED for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:55:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1334588109.28150.59.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] uprobes: introduce is_swbp_at_addr_fast() From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:55:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120416144457.GA7018@redhat.com> References: <20120405222024.GA19154@redhat.com> <20120405222106.GB19166@redhat.com> <1334570935.28150.25.camel@twins> <20120416144457.GA7018@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Srikar Dronamraju , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Jim Keniston , LKML , Linux-mm , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , Steven Rostedt , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Masami Hiramatsu , Thomas Gleixner , Anton Arapov On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 16:44 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 04/16, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 00:21 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > +int __weak is_swbp_at_addr_fast(unsigned long vaddr) > > > +{ > > > + uprobe_opcode_t opcode; > > > + int fault; > > > + > > > + pagefault_disable(); > > > + fault =3D __copy_from_user_inatomic(&opcode, (void __user*)va= ddr, > > > + sizeof(opcode= )); > > > + pagefault_enable(); > > > + > > > + if (unlikely(fault)) { > > > + /* > > > + * XXX: read_opcode() lacks FOLL_FORCE, it can fail i= f > > > + * we race with another thread which does mprotect(NO= NE) > > > + * after we hit bp. > > > + */ > > > + if (read_opcode(current->mm, vaddr, &opcode)) > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > + } > > > + > > > + return is_swbp_insn(&opcode); > > > +} > > > > Why bother with the pagefault_disable() and unlikely fault case and not > > simply do copy_from_user() and have it deal with the fault if its neede= d > > anyway? >=20 > But we can't do this under down_read(mmap_sem) ? >=20 > If another thread waits for down_write() then do_page_fault() can't take > this lock, right? Ah, indeed, I thought read_opcode() would do the fault, but that's get_user_pages() which requires the caller to hold mmap_sem instead. Can't we 'optimize' read_opcode() by doing the pagefault_disable() + __copy_from_user_inatomic() optimistically before going down the whole gup()+lock+kmap path? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org