From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx156.postini.com [74.125.245.156]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C9486B0044 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1334570935.28150.25.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] uprobes: introduce is_swbp_at_addr_fast() From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:08:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120405222106.GB19166@redhat.com> References: <20120405222024.GA19154@redhat.com> <20120405222106.GB19166@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Srikar Dronamraju , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Jim Keniston , LKML , Linux-mm , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , Steven Rostedt , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Masami Hiramatsu , Thomas Gleixner , Anton Arapov On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 00:21 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > +int __weak is_swbp_at_addr_fast(unsigned long vaddr) > +{ > + uprobe_opcode_t opcode; > + int fault; > + > + pagefault_disable(); > + fault =3D __copy_from_user_inatomic(&opcode, (void __user*)vaddr, > + sizeof(opcode)); > + pagefault_enable(); > + > + if (unlikely(fault)) { > + /* > + * XXX: read_opcode() lacks FOLL_FORCE, it can fail if > + * we race with another thread which does mprotect(NONE) > + * after we hit bp. > + */ > + if (read_opcode(current->mm, vaddr, &opcode)) > + return -EFAULT; > + } > + > + return is_swbp_insn(&opcode); > +}=20 Why bother with the pagefault_disable() and unlikely fault case and not simply do copy_from_user() and have it deal with the fault if its needed anyway? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org