From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hbabu@us.ibm.com, oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp, horms@verge.net.au,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v3 2/8] kdump: Make kimage_load_crash_segment() weak
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:02:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313762554.3858.37.camel@br98xy6r> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110819134836.GB18656@redhat.com>
Hello Vivek,
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 09:48 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[snip]
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > Thinking more about it. Can't we provide a arch specific version of
> > > kmap() and kunmap() so that we create temporary mappings to copy
> > > the pages and then these are torn off.
> >
> > Isn't kmap/kunmap() used for higmem? These functions are called from
> > many different functions in the Linux kernel, not only for kdump. I
> > would assume that creating and removing mappings with these functions is
> > not what a caller would expect and probably would break the Linux kernel
> > at many other places, no?
>
> [CCing linux-mm]
>
> Yes it is being used for highmem pages. If arch has not defined kmap()
> then generic definition is just returning page_address(page), expecting
> that page will be mapped.
>
> I was wondering that what will be broken if arch decides to extend this
> to create temporary mappings for pages which are not HIGHMEM but do
> not have any mapping. (Like this special case of s390).
At least we have significant additional overhead for all the other
places where kmap/kunmap is called.
> I guess memory management guys can give a better answer here. As a layman,
> kmap() seems to be the way to get a kernel mapping for any page frame
> and if one is not already there, then arch might create one on the fly,
> like we do for HIGHMEM pages. So the question is can be extend this
> to also cover pages which are not highmem but do not have any mappings
> on s390.
>
> >
> > Perhaps we can finish this discussion after my vacation. I will change
> > my patch series that we even do not need this patch...
>
> So how are you planning to get rid of this patch without modifying kmap(),
> kunmap() implementation for s390?
I will update my patch series that we do not remove page tables for
crashkernel memory. So everything will be as on other architectures.
I hope that we can find a good solution after my vacation. Perhaps then
I have enough energy again :-)
> > So only two common code patches are remaining. I will send the common
> > code patches again and will ask Andrew Morton to integrate them in the
> > next merge window.The s390 patches will be integrated by Martin.
>
> I am fine with merge of other 2 common patches. Once you repost the
> series, I will ack those.
Great! I will resend the patches and contact Andrew Morton.
Thanks!
Michael
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-19 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110812134849.748973593@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20110812134907.166585439@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20110818171541.GC15413@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1313760472.3858.26.camel@br98xy6r>
2011-08-19 13:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-19 14:02 ` Michael Holzheu [this message]
2011-08-19 14:28 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-08-19 14:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-19 14:44 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313762554.3858.37.camel@br98xy6r \
--to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox