From: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@yahoo.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
"\"\"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\"\""
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"\"linux-mm@kvack.org\"" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: running of out memory => kernel crash
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:07:02 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313046422.18195.YahooMailNeo@web111711.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108102106410.14230@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
>The default behavior is to kill all eligible and unkillable threads until
>there are none left to sacrifice (i.e. all kthreads and OOM_DISABLE).
In a simple test with virtualbox, I reduced the amount of ram to 300MB.
Then I ran "swapoff -a" and opened some applications. I noticed that the free
spaces is kept around 2-3MB and "kswapd" is running. Also I saw that disk
activity was very high.
That mean although "swap" partition is turned off, "kswapd" was trying to do
something. I wonder how that behavior can be explained?
>Ok, so you don't have a /proc/pid/oom_score_adj, so you're using a kernel
>that predates 2.6.36.
Yes, the srv machine that I posted those results, has kernel before 2.6.36
// Naderan *Mahmood;
----- Original Message -----
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@yahoo.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>; ""linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: running of out memory => kernel crash
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
> >If you're using cpusets or mempolicies, you must ensure that all tasks
> >attached to either of them are not set to OOM_DISABLE. It seems unlikely
> >that you're using those, so it seems like a system-wide oom condition.
>
> I didn't do that manually. What is the default behaviour? Does oom
> working or not?
>
The default behavior is to kill all eligible and unkillable threads until
there are none left to sacrifice (i.e. all kthreads and OOM_DISABLE).
> For a user process:
>
> root@srv:~# cat /proc/18564/oom_score
> 9198
> root@srv:~# cat /proc/18564/oom_adj
> 0
>
Ok, so you don't have a /proc/pid/oom_score_adj, so you're using a kernel
that predates 2.6.36.
> And for "init" process:
>
> root@srv:~# cat /proc/1/oom_score
> 17509
> root@srv:~# cat /proc/1/oom_adj
> 0
>
> Based on my understandings, in an out of memory condition (oom),
> the init process is more eligible to be killed!!!!!!! Is that right?
>
init is exempt from oom killing, it's oom_score is meaningless.
> Again I didn't get my answer yet:
> What is the default behavior of linux in an oom condition? If the default is,
> crash (kernel panic), then how can I change that in such a way to kill
> the hungry process?
>
You either have /proc/sys/vm/panic_on_oom set or it's killing a thread
that is taking down the entire machine. If it's the latter, then please
capture the kernel log and post it as Randy suggested.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-11 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1312872786.70934.YahooMailNeo@web111712.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
2011-08-09 7:06 ` Randy Dunlap
[not found] ` <1312874259.89770.YahooMailNeo@web111704.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
2011-08-09 16:03 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-10 8:14 ` Mahmood Naderan
2011-08-11 4:09 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-11 7:07 ` Mahmood Naderan [this message]
2011-08-11 7:13 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-11 8:02 ` Mahmood Naderan
2011-08-11 12:47 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-08-11 15:13 ` Mahmood Naderan
2011-08-11 17:38 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-08-17 8:50 ` Mahmood Naderan
2011-08-18 2:18 ` Pavel Ivanov
2011-08-18 12:44 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-08-18 14:26 ` Pavel Ivanov
2011-08-18 22:25 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-08-19 19:21 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-19 19:29 ` Bryan Donlan
2011-08-19 21:19 ` Chris Friesen
2011-08-19 21:38 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313046422.18195.YahooMailNeo@web111711.mail.gq1.yahoo.com \
--to=nt_mahmood@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox