From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: preemptless __per_cpu_counter_add
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:19:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304065171.3981.594.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110428100938.GA10721@htj.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 18:09 +0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:28:04AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > Okay, this communication failure isn't my fault. Please re-read what
> > > I wrote before, my concern wasn't primarily about pathological worst
> > > case - if that many concurrent updates are happening && the counter
> > > needs to be accurate, it can't even use atomic counter. It should be
> > > doing full exclusion around the counter and the associated operation
> > > _together_.
> > >
> > > I'm worried about sporadic erratic behavior happening regardless of
> > > update frequency and preemption would contribute but isn't necessary
> > > for that to happen.
> >
> > Ok, I misunderstood the mail you sent to Christoph, sorry. So you have
> > no problem about the atomic convert. I'll update the patch against base
> > tree, given the preemptless patch has problem.
>
> Hmm... we're now more lost than ever. :-( Can you please re-read my
> message two replies ago? The one where I talked about sporadic
> erratic behaviors in length and why I was worried about it.
>
> In your last reply, you talked about preemption and that you didn't
> have problems with disabling preemption, which, unfortunately, doesn't
> have much to do with my concern with the sporadic erratic behaviors
> and that's what I pointed out in my previous reply. So, it doesn't
> feel like anything is resolved.
ok, I got your point. I'd agree there is sporadic erratic behaviors, but
I expect there is no problem here. We all agree the worst case is the
same before/after the change. Any program should be able to handle the
worst case, otherwise the program itself is buggy. Discussing a buggy
program is meaningless. After the change, something behavior is changed,
but the worst case isn't. So I don't think this is a big problem.
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-13 14:45 Christoph Lameter
2011-04-13 16:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-13 18:56 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13 20:22 ` [PATCH] " Christoph Lameter
2011-04-13 21:50 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13 22:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-13 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-13 23:55 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-14 2:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 2:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 21:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-14 21:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-15 17:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-15 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-15 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-15 23:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 14:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-21 14:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-21 14:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-21 17:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-21 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-21 18:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-21 18:37 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-21 18:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-21 19:08 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-22 2:33 ` Shaohua Li
2011-04-26 12:10 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 19:02 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-27 10:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 5:43 ` Shaohua Li
2011-04-27 10:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 3:28 ` Shaohua Li
2011-04-28 10:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 14:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-28 14:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 14:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 14:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-28 14:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-28 14:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 14:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-28 14:56 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 15:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-28 15:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 15:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-28 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 15:40 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 15:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-28 15:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-28 15:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-28 16:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-28 16:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-28 16:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-28 16:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-29 8:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 8:32 ` Shaohua Li
2011-04-29 8:19 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2011-04-29 8:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 14:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-29 14:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-29 14:18 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 14:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-04-29 14:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-05 4:08 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304065171.3981.594.camel@sli10-conroe \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox