From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: "Kanchan Joshi" <joshi.k@samsung.com>, "Jake Edge" <jake@lwn.net>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Zhu Yanjun" <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
"Yishai Hadas" <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
"Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, "Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@nvidia.com>,
"Nitesh Shetty" <nj.shetty@samsung.com>,
"Leon Romanovsky" <leonro@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 24/24] nvme-pci: optimize single-segment handling
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 17:02:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284adf3-7e93-4530-9921-408c5eaeb337@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <670389227a033bd5b7c5aa55191aac9943244028.1744825142.git.leon@kernel.org>
On 4/18/25 15:47, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
>
> blk_rq_dma_map API is costly for single-segment requests.
> Avoid using it and map the bio_vec directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 8d99a8f871ea..cf020de82962 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,11 @@ struct nvme_queue {
> struct completion delete_done;
> };
>
> +enum {
> + IOD_LARGE_DESCRIPTORS = 1, /* uses the full page sized descriptor pool */
> + IOD_SINGLE_SEGMENT = 2, /* single segment dma mapping */
> +};
> +
> /*
> * The nvme_iod describes the data in an I/O.
> */
> @@ -224,7 +229,7 @@ struct nvme_iod {
> struct nvme_command cmd;
> bool aborted;
> u8 nr_descriptors; /* # of PRP/SGL descriptors */
> - bool large_descriptors; /* uses the full page sized descriptor pool */
> + unsigned int flags;
> unsigned int total_len; /* length of the entire transfer */
> unsigned int total_meta_len; /* length of the entire metadata transfer */
> dma_addr_t meta_dma;
> @@ -529,7 +534,7 @@ static inline bool nvme_pci_use_sgls(struct nvme_dev *dev, struct request *req,
> static inline struct dma_pool *nvme_dma_pool(struct nvme_dev *dev,
> struct nvme_iod *iod)
> {
> - if (iod->large_descriptors)
> + if (iod->flags & IOD_LARGE_DESCRIPTORS)
> return dev->prp_page_pool;
> return dev->prp_small_pool;
> }
> @@ -630,6 +635,15 @@ static void nvme_free_sgls(struct nvme_dev *dev, struct request *req)
> static void nvme_unmap_data(struct nvme_dev *dev, struct request *req)
> {
> struct nvme_iod *iod = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> + unsigned int nr_segments = blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req);
> + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> +
> + if (nr_segments == 1 && (iod->flags & IOD_SINGLE_SEGMENT)) {
nvme_pci_setup_prps() calls nvme_try_setup_prp_simple() which sets
IOD_SINGLE_SEGMENT if and only if the req has a single phys segment. So why do
you need to count the segments again here ? Looking at the flag only should be
enough, no ?
> + dma_addr = le64_to_cpu(iod->cmd.common.dptr.prp1);
> + dma_unmap_page(dev->dev, dma_addr, iod->total_len,
> + rq_dma_dir(req));
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (!blk_rq_dma_unmap(req, dev->dev, &iod->dma_state, iod->total_len)) {
> if (iod->cmd.common.flags & NVME_CMD_SGL_METABUF)
> @@ -642,6 +656,41 @@ static void nvme_unmap_data(struct nvme_dev *dev, struct request *req)
> nvme_free_descriptors(dev, req);
> }
>
> +static bool nvme_try_setup_prp_simple(struct nvme_dev *dev, struct request *req,
> + struct nvme_rw_command *cmnd,
> + struct blk_dma_iter *iter)
> +{
> + struct nvme_iod *iod = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> + struct bio_vec bv = req_bvec(req);
> + unsigned int first_prp_len;
> +
> + if (is_pci_p2pdma_page(bv.bv_page))
> + return false;
> + if ((bv.bv_offset & (NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE - 1)) + bv.bv_len >
> + NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE * 2)
> + return false;
> +
> + iter->addr = dma_map_bvec(dev->dev, &bv, rq_dma_dir(req), 0);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(dev->dev, iter->addr)) {
> + iter->status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + iod->total_len = bv.bv_len;
> + cmnd->dptr.prp1 = cpu_to_le64(iter->addr);
> +
> + first_prp_len = NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE -
> + (bv.bv_offset & (NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE - 1));
> + if (bv.bv_len > first_prp_len)
> + cmnd->dptr.prp2 = cpu_to_le64(iter->addr + first_prp_len);
> + else
> + cmnd->dptr.prp2 = 0;
> +
> + iter->status = BLK_STS_OK;
> + iod->flags |= IOD_SINGLE_SEGMENT;
> +out:
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static blk_status_t nvme_pci_setup_prps(struct nvme_dev *dev,
> struct request *req)
> {
> @@ -652,6 +701,12 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_pci_setup_prps(struct nvme_dev *dev,
> dma_addr_t prp1_dma, prp2_dma = 0;
> unsigned int prp_len, i;
> __le64 *prp_list;
> + unsigned int nr_segments = blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req);
> +
> + if (nr_segments == 1) {
> + if (nvme_try_setup_prp_simple(dev, req, cmnd, &iter))
> + return iter.status;
> + }
>
> if (!blk_rq_dma_map_iter_start(req, dev->dev, &iod->dma_state, &iter))
> return iter.status;
> @@ -693,7 +748,7 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_pci_setup_prps(struct nvme_dev *dev,
>
> if (DIV_ROUND_UP(length, NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE) >
> NVME_SMALL_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE / sizeof(__le64))
> - iod->large_descriptors = true;
> + iod->flags |= IOD_LARGE_DESCRIPTORS;
>
> prp_list = dma_pool_alloc(nvme_dma_pool(dev, iod), GFP_ATOMIC,
> &prp2_dma);
> @@ -808,7 +863,7 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_pci_setup_sgls(struct nvme_dev *dev,
> }
>
> if (entries > NVME_SMALL_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE / sizeof(*sg_list))
> - iod->large_descriptors = true;
> + iod->flags |= IOD_LARGE_DESCRIPTORS;
>
> sg_list = dma_pool_alloc(nvme_dma_pool(dev, iod), GFP_ATOMIC, &sgl_dma);
> if (!sg_list)
> @@ -932,7 +987,7 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_prep_rq(struct nvme_dev *dev, struct request *req)
>
> iod->aborted = false;
> iod->nr_descriptors = 0;
> - iod->large_descriptors = false;
> + iod->flags = 0;
> iod->total_len = 0;
> iod->total_meta_len = 0;
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-18 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 6:47 [PATCH v8 00/24] Provide a new two step DMA mapping API Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 01/24] PCI/P2PDMA: Refactor the p2pdma mapping helpers Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-20 20:05 ` ALOK TIWARI
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 02/24] dma-mapping: move the PCI P2PDMA mapping helpers to pci-p2pdma.h Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-20 20:09 ` ALOK TIWARI
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 03/24] iommu: generalize the batched sync after map interface Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 04/24] iommu: add kernel-doc for iommu_unmap and iommu_unmap_fast Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-22 4:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-22 6:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 05/24] dma-mapping: Provide an interface to allow allocate IOVA Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 06/24] iommu/dma: Factor out a iommu_dma_map_swiotlb helper Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 07/24] dma-mapping: Implement link/unlink ranges API Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-20 20:23 ` ALOK TIWARI
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 08/24] dma-mapping: add a dma_need_unmap helper Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 09/24] docs: core-api: document the IOVA-based API Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 10/24] mm/hmm: let users to tag specific PFN with DMA mapped bit Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-22 4:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 11/24] mm/hmm: provide generic DMA managing logic Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 12/24] RDMA/umem: Store ODP access mask information in PFN Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 13/24] RDMA/core: Convert UMEM ODP DMA mapping to caching IOVA and page linkage Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 14/24] RDMA/umem: Separate implicit ODP initialization from explicit ODP Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 15/24] vfio/mlx5: Explicitly use number of pages instead of allocated length Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 16/24] vfio/mlx5: Rewrite create mkey flow to allow better code reuse Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 17/24] vfio/mlx5: Enable the DMA link API Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 18/24] block: share more code for bio addition helper Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 19/24] block: don't merge different kinds of P2P transfers in a single bio Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 20/24] blk-mq: add scatterlist-less DMA mapping helpers Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 18:03 ` ALOK TIWARI
2025-04-20 7:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-22 4:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-22 6:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 21/24] nvme-pci: remove struct nvme_descriptor Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 22/24] nvme-pci: use a better encoding for small prp pool allocations Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 23/24] nvme-pci: convert to blk_rq_dma_map Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 18:29 ` ALOK TIWARI
2025-04-22 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-22 7:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-22 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-18 6:47 ` [PATCH v8 24/24] nvme-pci: optimize single-segment handling Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 8:02 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-04-18 11:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 12:32 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-04-22 4:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-22 7:44 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-22 11:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 11:16 ` [PATCH v8 00/24] Provide a new two step DMA mapping API Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 12:18 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-20 7:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1284adf3-7e93-4530-9921-408c5eaeb337@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox