From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: why are WB_SYNC_NONE COMMITs being done with FLUSH_SYNC set ?
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:22:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283196174.2920.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100820132309.GB20126@localhost>
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 21:23 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > Here's a lightly tested patch that turns the check for the two flags
> > > into a check for WB_SYNC_NONE. It seems to do the right thing, but I
> > > don't have a clear testcase for it. Does this look reasonable?
> >
> > Looks fine to me. I'll queue it up for the post-2.6.36 merge window...
>
> Trond, I just created a patch that removes the wbc->nonblocking
> definition and all its references except NFS. So there will be merge
> dependencies. What should we do? To push both patches to Andrew's -mm
> tree?
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
Do you want to include it as part of your series? Just remember to add
an
Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cheers
Trond
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-30 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100819101525.076831ad@barsoom.rdu.redhat.com>
2010-08-19 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-19 14:58 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-19 15:11 ` Jeff Layton
2010-08-19 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-19 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2010-08-19 19:43 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-08-20 13:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-30 19:22 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2010-08-30 23:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-20 0:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-20 0:53 ` Jeff Layton
2010-08-20 13:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-19 23:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-20 0:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-20 2:36 ` Sage Weil
2010-08-20 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-20 11:27 ` Jeff Layton
2010-08-20 12:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-20 12:26 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1283196174.2920.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=fengguang.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox