From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471AE6B01F0 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:35:34 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFCv4 0/6] The Contiguous Memory Allocator framework From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <201008281508.19756.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> References: <1282310110.2605.976.camel@laptop> <20100825155814.25c783c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <201008281508.19756.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:34:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1283002486.1975.3479.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Hans Verkuil Cc: Andrew Morton , Michal Nazarewicz , linux-mm@kvack.org, Daniel Walker , FUJITA Tomonori , Jonathan Corbet , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Mark Brown , Pawel Osciak , Russell King , Zach Pfeffer , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman List-ID: On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 15:08 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > That would be good. Although I expect that the allocation would need > > to be 100% rock-solid reliable, otherwise the end user has a > > non-functioning device. >=20 > Yes, indeed. And you have to be careful as well how you move pages around=