linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] powerpc/85xx: Switch to 64 bits PGD
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 09:02:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281454b-5025-4f18-b806-ca28b5136642@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZlFvFk6QmyD-ieS5@localhost.localdomain>



Le 25/05/2024 à 06:54, Oscar Salvador a écrit :
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 09:00:09PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> In order to allow leaf PMD entries, switch the PGD to 64 bits entries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> 
> I do not quite understand this change.
> Are not powerE500 and power85xx two different things?

Yes they are two different things, but one contains the other

e500 is the processor-core which is included inside the MPC85xx micro 
controller.

But CONFIG_PPC_E500 is a bit more than e500 core, it also includes e5500 
and e6500 which are evolutions of e500.

mpc85xx is 32 bits
e5500 and e6500 are 64 bits



> You are changing making it 64 for PPC_E500_64bits, but you are updating head_85xx.
> Are they sharing this code?

Not exactly. mpc85xx can be built with 32 bits PTE or 64 bits PTE, based 
on CONFIG_PTE_64BIT

When CONFIG_PTE_64BIT is selected it uses the same PTE layout on 32-bits 
and 64-bits. But on 32-bits the PGD is still 32-bits, so it is not 
possible to use leaf entries at PGD level hence the change.

When CONFIG_PTE_64BIT is not selected, huge pages are not supported.

> 
> Also, we would benefit from a slightly bigger changelog, explaining why
> do we need this change in some more detail.

Yes I can write this is because PTEs are 64-bits allthought I thought it 
was obvious.

> 
>   
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-types.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
>> index 082c85cc09b1..db965d98e0ae 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
>> @@ -49,7 +49,11 @@ static inline unsigned long pud_val(pud_t x)
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>>   
>>   /* PGD level */
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_E500) && defined(CONFIG_PTE_64BIT)
>> +typedef struct { unsigned long long pgd; } pgd_t;
>> +#else
>>   typedef struct { unsigned long pgd; } pgd_t;
>> +#endif
>>   #define __pgd(x)	((pgd_t) { (x) })
>>   static inline unsigned long pgd_val(pgd_t x)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S
>> index 39724ff5ae1f..a305244afc9f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S
>> @@ -307,8 +307,9 @@ set_ivor:
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PTE_64BIT
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
>>   #define FIND_PTE	\
>> -	rlwinm	r12, r10, 13, 19, 29;	/* Compute pgdir/pmd offset */	\
>> -	lwzx	r11, r12, r11;		/* Get pgd/pmd entry */		\
>> +	rlwinm	r12, r10, 14, 18, 28;	/* Compute pgdir/pmd offset */	\
>> +	add	r12, r11, r12;
> 
> You add the offset to pgdir?

Yes because later r12 points to the PTE so when it is a leaf PGD entry 
we need r12 to point to that entry.

> 
>> +	lwz	r11, 4(r12);		/* Get pgd/pmd entry */		\
> 
> What is i offset 4?

It is big endian, the entry is now 64 bits but the real content of the 
entry is still 32 bits so it is in the lower word.

> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-25  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-17 18:59 [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] mm: Provide pagesize to pmd_populate() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20  9:01   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-20 16:24     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 11:57       ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22  8:37         ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] mm: Provide page size to pte_alloc_huge() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] mm: Provide pmd to pte_leaf_size() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21  9:39   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 10:22     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20  9:14   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-20 16:31     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 17:42       ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22  8:45         ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21  0:48       ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-21  9:26         ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22  8:32           ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 12:18             ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-24 10:02   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-24 11:47     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25  3:36   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25  3:40   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25  4:12   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25  6:41     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] powerpc/mm: Complement huge_pte_alloc() for all non HUGEPD setups Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25  4:29   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25  6:44     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 10:33       ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] powerpc/64e: Remove unneeded #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_E500 Christophe Leroy
2024-05-24  7:31   ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-24  8:45     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] powerpc/64e: Clean up impossible setups Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] powerpc/e500: Remove enc field from struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25  4:35   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] powerpc/85xx: Switch to 64 bits PGD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25  4:54   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25  9:02     ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 12:54   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-20 16:43     ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22  1:13       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-22  9:32         ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 12:23         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-18  6:28   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-23 19:40 ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24  4:46   ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-27 14:14     ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24  6:31   ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1281454b-5025-4f18-b806-ca28b5136642@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox