linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] writeback: avoid unnecessary calculation of bdi dirty thresholds
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:03:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280847822.1923.597.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100711021748.879183413@intel.com>

On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 10:06 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> plain text document attachment (writeback-less-bdi-calc.patch)
> Split get_dirty_limits() into global_dirty_limits()+bdi_dirty_limit(),
> so that the latter can be avoided when under global dirty background
> threshold (which is the normal state for most systems).

The patch looks OK, although esp with the proposed comments in the
follow up email, bdi_dirty_limit() gets a bit confusing wrt to how and
what the limit is.

Maybe its clearer to not call task_dirty_limit() from bdi_dirty_limit(),
that way the comment can focus on the device write request completion
proportion thing.

> +unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> +			       unsigned long dirty)
> +{
> +	u64 bdi_dirty;
> +	long numerator, denominator;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Calculate this BDI's share of the dirty ratio.
> +	 */
> +	bdi_writeout_fraction(bdi, &numerator, &denominator);
>  
> +	bdi_dirty = (dirty * (100 - bdi_min_ratio)) / 100;
> +	bdi_dirty *= numerator;
> +	do_div(bdi_dirty, denominator);
>  
> +	bdi_dirty += (dirty * bdi->min_ratio) / 100;
> +	if (bdi_dirty > (dirty * bdi->max_ratio) / 100)
> +		bdi_dirty = dirty * bdi->max_ratio / 100;
> +
  +       return bdi_dirty;
>  }

And then add the call to task_dirty_limit() here:

> +++ linux-next/mm/backing-dev.c	2010-07-11 08:53:44.000000000 +0800
> @@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ static int bdi_debug_stats_show(struct s
>  		nr_more_io++;
>  	spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
>  
> -	get_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh, &bdi_thresh, bdi);
> +	global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
> +	bdi_thresh = bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, dirty_thresh);
  +       bdi_thresh = task_dirty_limit(current, bdi_thresh);

And add a comment to task_dirty_limit() as well, explaining its reason
for existence (protecting light/slow dirtying tasks from heavier/fast
ones).


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-03 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-11  2:06 [PATCH 0/6] writeback cleanups and trivial fixes Wu Fengguang
2010-07-11  2:06 ` [PATCH 1/6] writeback: take account of NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP in balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2010-07-12 21:52   ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-13  8:58     ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-07-15 14:50       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-11  2:06 ` [PATCH 2/6] writeback: reduce calls to global_page_state " Wu Fengguang
2010-07-26 15:19   ` Jan Kara
2010-07-27  3:59     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-27  9:12       ` Jan Kara
2010-07-28  2:04         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-03 14:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-11  2:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] writeback: avoid unnecessary calculation of bdi dirty thresholds Wu Fengguang
2010-07-12 21:56   ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-15 14:55     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-19 21:35   ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-20  3:34     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-20  4:14       ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-03 15:03   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-08-03 15:10     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-04 16:41     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-08-04 17:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-11  2:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] writeback: dont redirty tail an inode with dirty pages Wu Fengguang
2010-07-12  2:01   ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12 15:31     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-12 22:13       ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-15 15:35         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-11  2:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] writeback: fix queue_io() ordering Wu Fengguang
2010-07-12 22:15   ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-11  2:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] writeback: merge for_kupdate and !for_kupdate cases Wu Fengguang
2010-07-12  2:08   ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12 15:52     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-12 22:06       ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12 22:22       ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-05 16:01         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-07-11  2:44 ` [PATCH 0/6] writeback cleanups and trivial fixes Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-11  2:50   ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1280847822.1923.597.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox