linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] Cleanup: use for_each_online_cpu in vmstat
@ 2010-06-10 13:28 Minchan Kim
  2010-06-11  0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Minchan Kim @ 2010-06-10 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Minchan Kim, KOSAKI Motohiro, Christoph Lameter

The sum_vm_events passes cpumask for for_each_cpu.
But it's useless since we have for_each_online_cpu.
Althougth it's tirival overhead, it's not good about
coding consistency.

Let's use for_each_online_cpu instead of for_each_cpu with
cpumask argument.

Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
---
 mm/vmstat.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
index 7759941..15a14b1 100644
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@ -22,14 +22,14 @@
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vm_event_state, vm_event_states) = {{0}};
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(vm_event_states);
 
-static void sum_vm_events(unsigned long *ret, const struct cpumask *cpumask)
+static void sum_vm_events(unsigned long *ret)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	int i;
 
 	memset(ret, 0, NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS * sizeof(unsigned long));
 
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct vm_event_state *this = &per_cpu(vm_event_states, cpu);
 
 		for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS; i++)
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static void sum_vm_events(unsigned long *ret, const struct cpumask *cpumask)
 void all_vm_events(unsigned long *ret)
 {
 	get_online_cpus();
-	sum_vm_events(ret, cpu_online_mask);
+	sum_vm_events(ret);
 	put_online_cpus();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(all_vm_events);
-- 
1.7.0.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Cleanup: use for_each_online_cpu in vmstat
  2010-06-10 13:28 [PATCH 1/2] Cleanup: use for_each_online_cpu in vmstat Minchan Kim
@ 2010-06-11  0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2010-06-11  0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Minchan Kim
  Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-mm, linux-kernel, KOSAKI Motohiro,
	Christoph Lameter

On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:28:46 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:

> The sum_vm_events passes cpumask for for_each_cpu.
> But it's useless since we have for_each_online_cpu.
> Althougth it's tirival overhead, it's not good about
> coding consistency.
> 
> Let's use for_each_online_cpu instead of for_each_cpu with
> cpumask argument.
> 
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-11  1:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-10 13:28 [PATCH 1/2] Cleanup: use for_each_online_cpu in vmstat Minchan Kim
2010-06-11  0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox